are not the kindest of tools and Wine has no
shortage of environmental challenges, yet the source tree seems to be
very solid and clean base for people to work with.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
On June 19, 2004 03:24 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:01:31 -0400, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Excellent, I'm glad this was said. One only has to look at the swing
away from binary-distributions as a case in point - people *want* to
eliminate unknown layers of patches, packaging
, the redistribution
clauses of the (L)GPL apply ...
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
with the guy who was organising
it, but I didn't take notes :-).
Then again, which free X project would be first to develop this?
evil grin
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
On April 21, 2004 05:21 pm, Ryan Underwood wrote:
What about something like MAS (http://www.mediaapplicationserver.net)?
Yeah, that'd probably do it :-)
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
Hi,
On April 5, 2004 10:57 am, Jacek [KRunch] Chaupka wrote:
Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE??
I know that Juan Lang has already been making inroads into this.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
these snapshot moments from his end. That is,
after timezones have been argued to hell and back, really the only place
where the right moment for a useful test can be accurately determined
(and without unduly delay).
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
for the OT post, but this brightened up an otherwise dull lunch
break.
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
of libcrypto.so (www.openssl.org) perhaps this
might be the place? Does anyone have good refs/links to the corresponding
win32 side of this?
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
curious that you thought noone was
interested, because I for one have been very much looking forward to
seeing how it works out! :-)
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
that may be). I prefer to use my own
choice and configuration of news and mail clients than to have a
web-based interface forced down my throat. But as I've yet to see a
web-based forum that I liked, I may be biased...
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
. In
the mean time, (and as long as people in the US are involved in Wine,)
we're stuck with them.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
But I'm digressing, again.
Sorry.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
, clarifications of this
from any qualified opinions are most welcome.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
On October 9, 2003 10:54 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On October 9, 2003 09:58 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
look/feel/use, like wine-cvs. I would have personally thought that
attachments make more sense, because separating patches from text can
be ambiguous and it's not as easy to send multiple
FWIW: I'm away soon for a few days, so you'll have to continue this
without me (a fact which is no doubt to your infinite relief :-).
On October 10, 2003 11:27 am, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
[snip]
I haven't dispatched you to the archives to be rude
the
same rules as the list-server but responds to the sender with parsing
results.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
Hi Dimitrie,
On September 9, 2003 10:49 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On September 9, 2003 10:34 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
On the other hand, I *have* duplicated the interface
verbatim in terms of using exactly the same element names, the same
order of elements in the structures, etc
18 matches
Mail list logo
