Hi,
I wonder if Wine will profit from the new X Presentation and Synchronization
feature NVIDIA is working on:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/x-presentation-and-synchronization.pdf
According to the Phoronix article the feature is planed for X.Org Server 1.10:
This looks like a manipulation for me.
How is this calculated?
http://appdb.winehq.org/
http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=endep=thMx..search=manipulation
I just found two conflicting reports for Age of empires:
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=versioniId=10326
Both are on Ubuntu 8.04 and 1.0-rc1. One is Silver, one is Garbage. But
it is just one example.
My suggestion is to ask for more information about the test
Hi,
I have read many valuable information from Detlef, Roderick and Stefan
about this topic. Thank you very much for this so far!
e.g.
http://wiki.winehq.org/DirectDraw
http://wiki.winehq.org/UsefulRegistryKeys
and some comments in bugzilla.
But it is still very hard for me to tell what I
The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
Stefaniuc, Michael wrote:
It points to wine-devel.
bye
michael
No, it doesn't.
A HREF=http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-cvs;wine-devel at
winehq.org/A
I apologize I was not looking in the diff but in the wine-cvs message
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-March/041392.html
There it points to wine-cvs.
I don't know where this difference comes from.
But wouldn't be http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel better
than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just quote: Note: You should be subscribed to the lists before you
post to them, otherwise your posting will be treated as possible spam by
the mailing list software.
The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
