Re: gdi32: Use the LOGFONT charset field on OEM font creation

Hi, Is this patch incorrect or more tests are needed? Dmitry said that there are needed additional tests, but you wouldn't like to commit these. Please explain my mistakes. -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: gdi32: Use the LOGFONT charset field on OEM font creation

On Tuesday 05 January 2010 17:08:52 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Ilya Shpigor shpi...@etersoft.ru wrote: Some explanation for this patch: The fsCsb is bitfield that is used as boolean value. If this is false the DEFAULT_CHARSET is using and the real charset is choosen through the current

Re: [TRY 2] extrac32: Create directory tree before extraction

Hi, Why this patch don't have been commited? There are mistakes? I really want to make extrac32 better, but I don't know what to do if nobody answer me. -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: comctl32: Implementation the WM_GETTEXT processing of datetime control

of window text are same things. Datetime control have own interpretation of data in the self text buffers. Using window text will need some synchronization when this data change. Can I do it? -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: comctl32: Implementation the WM_GETTEXT processing of datetime control

? This message must be send to control directly and be processed through CallWindowProc with DefWindowProc parameter. Is this test give right results? P.S. Also don't forget comments regarding tests part. The second try of test have been send. -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: user32/tests: Test edit control to WM_GETTEXT processing after WM_DESTROY

Please don't commit this test. Instead use or comment next try: user32: Destroy EDITSTATE structure in the WM_NCDESTROY message processing -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: [1/2] extrac32: Add command-line parsing

Hi, What about this group of two patches? Is this correct or there are mistakes? -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: [TRY 2] [1/3] programs: initial add extrac32 utility

You need to include patched configure.ac as well with new WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE entry. Are there other troubles in these patches? -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: [TRY 2] [1/3] programs: initial add extrac32 utility

but it is not necessary). -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: [TRY 4] user32/tests: Add tests for STM_SETIMAGE and STM_SETICONmessage processing

doesn't like to answer? :) -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: comctl32: Send the parent notification after the Wine has set the tooltip position (bug #14336)

On Monday 28 September 2009 19:36:05 you wrote: Could you please add a test for that? Test for this patch has been sent: comctl32/tests: Add test for setting the tooltips position by parent -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: user32: Add check for the need to redraw static control after STM_SETIMAGE and STM_SETICON

to block this redrawing? -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.

Re: user32: Add check for the need to redraw static control afterSTM_SETIMAGE and STM_SETICON

First thing to do (as usual) is to add the test to show the drawing behaviour. Ok. I will make TRY 4 of tests. -- Best regards, Ilya Shpigor.