On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:27:16 +0200
Remco remc...@gmail.com wrote:
How about, instead of calling the next major release version 1.2, call
it version 2.0? The reason is purely marketing: an x.0 number will
attract more press. Last major release was 1.0. It seems fitting to
have the next major
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:47:32 +0100
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. The biggest problem for free-as-in-freedom software - Linux and
GIMP, and to some extent Wine - is that Windows and Photoshop are
effectively free-as-in-beer software ...
http://autotelic.com/windows_is_free
On Fri, 8 May 2009 18:43:20 +0100
IneedAname wineap...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows is not free. You can buy a EeePC running Linux that has 8GB more then
the windows version.
Both the Linux and Windows versions are at the same price.
Sorry I send this email with out finishing it.
On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:41:31 -0700
Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote:
Anyway, please feel free to give way too much feedback :)
I like then but not the one with the folder on. The gray colour just does not
work for me.
On Mon, 4 May 2009 22:12:04 +1000
Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/4 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com:
Then they disappear. There would be no way to search for metabugs, for
example, whereas at the moment you can search for Blockers. There's no
point in keeping metabugs if there's
On Sun, 3 May 2009 23:31:45 -0400
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
+1. Or just remove priorities for users altogether.
Looks like some one is thinking round here!
That gets my vote to.
On Sat, 2 May 2009 16:52:06 +0200
Nicklas Börjesson nicklas.borjes...@ws.se wrote:
3. Major Major loss of functionality for a wide range of applications
- Isn't this just all bugs that has more than $arbitrary_number of
applications linked to them? An aggregate, rather than a level?
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:26:38 -0500
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently it keeps getting reinstalled. I encountered it yesterday
when installing kernel updates and a few other things. I didn't bother
to check what package is depending on it, only noticed it once my test
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:58:00 +
Ricardo Filipe ricardojdfil...@gmail.com wrote:
bug links are manually recoverable, searching bugzilla and linking should be
easy, i can do that if you feel you don't have time to.
You can find a copy of wine appdb here http://ftp.winehq.org/pub/wine/
So
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:10:13 +
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. That's why a wiki is nice. If you open it up to everyone to
contribute, you'll get bad stuff but you'll get good stuff you just
wouldn't get otherwise. It's a great format to capture that.
We would use the same
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:36:11 +0100
Klaus Layer klaus.la...@gmx.de wrote:
Rozanne just deleted an entry which was
maintained by me. According to the email I received, there were duplicated
entries for the programm Mapsource. I regard deleting entries from Appdb
without giving the maintainer
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 00:10:59 +1100
Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
A wiki is likely to be highly unsuccessful for AppDB when the focus is
on test data.
I'm thing about the notes made by the app maintainers.
Not the whole AppDB.
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:08:02 -0600
Jeremy Newman jnew...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Software upgrades complete.
So whats new?
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
I'll fix it up as needed.
It does not my detect distro version. Can that be done?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:11:20 +0100
Martin Hinner mar...@hinner.info wrote:
The problem is that some (almost all?) distributions simply execute
.exe file when you click on it. I was amazed when testing JTAGTest on
Linux! This is in my opinion quite big issue as ordinary users do not
have
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:35:20 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
Yes, there are legit reasons to run as root, one of them is the now famous
ICMP 'Ping' unavailability issue in Linux. Experts know about this and how
to work around it. Newbies, used to Windows
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:18:04 -0600
EA Durbin ead1...@hotmail.com wrote:
That and I can't the source code anywhere on their site.
Here is a copy of what I have send to then.
I want the source code of the version(s) of Wine you package with your OS.
If you have not read Wine's license now is the
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 01:20:47 -0500
Zachary Goldberg zg...@bluesata.com wrote:
Comments?
Can we have a wiki like change log for the notes in the AppDB to see whats be
changed when and by who.
Can we have a easy way for maintainers to (plan check for bugs give there
system spec and so on).
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:02:12 +0100
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes a...@thehandofagony.com wrote:
What if we add a small questionnaire which will then pick the approprite
Gold/Silver ... rating?
That what I like to see.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:48:34 +
Darragh Bailey fe...@compsoc.nuigalway.ie wrote:
Warcraft III and Frozen Throne expansion was released to support Windows
98/ME/2k/XP. Nowhere in it's patch notes does it say that the minimum
requirements to run Warcraft 3 have changed to have the minimum
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:33:21 +1100
Peter Urbanec winehq@urbanec.net wrote:
Speaking of dates... My pet peeve is seeing ambiguous dates such as
2/1/08. To me (and most of the world), that looks like 2nd Jan 2008, but
it appears that millions of people in the USA see it as 1st Feb 2008.
So,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:52:46 -0800
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
http://wiki.winehq.org/AppsThatSupportWine is a nice
stopgap, but perhaps it should be a report in the
appdb, driven by a checkbox that maintainers can check.
What do folks think?
You get my vote!
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:46:06 -0500
Sparr spa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not investigated the state of wine launchers in about a year
now. Do any of those handle multiple WINEPREFIXes? That is the most
important feature of Cedega's launcher that I was never able to find
in a wine launcher.
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:23:52 -0800
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
./configure --target=i686-unknown-gnu-linux
What does that do? It's not listed in ./configure --help.
For building 64bit wine I have to pass --enable-win64.
32bit wine builds with just make.
I am running Ubuntu 8.04 with an
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:44:39 +0100
Massimo Del Fedele m...@veneto.com wrote:
How should I publish it ?
http://repo.or.cz/w/wine.git?a=forks
Looks like Patchwatcher has being offline from 09-Dec-2008.
Did I miss something or did someone trip over the mains cable?
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:45:52 -0700
Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new machine has a fairly modern nvidia card, so
more of the tests are actually run.
Where can I find the spec of the new machine ?
Are you using the closed source driver ?
I want to see the full system spec hardware and
27 matches
Mail list logo
