Re: Alarming number of users getting hardlocks with Wine

2007-05-25 Thread James Liggett
esktop back to my usual resolution, 1024x768. I can move the mouse cursor, but keyboard input is dead, and the computer is just unresponsive. This is on a GeForce 6800GT, AGP bus, with drivers 1.0-9755, on Ubuntu Feisty. James Liggett

Re: Status regarding the recent Appdb vandalism

2007-05-23 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 17:37 +0200, Jan Zerebecki wrote: > > The following applications where mentioned in these notification emails: > Adobe Illustrator > Battlefield 1942 > Battlefield 2 > Battlefield 2142 > Call of Duty 2 > Call of Duty > Checkpoint Firewall-1 Policy editor > Command & Conquer 3

Re: mentoring

2007-05-14 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 20:33 -0400, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > > What Stefan says about discussing patches > > is true--it helps if there's not a lot of debate around a patch. > > > This quote should go down in the history of open source :) > I hope the word you're looking for is "controversy". Ye

Re: mentoring

2007-05-14 Thread James Liggett
oper isn't around anymore, but you might get lucky and he may be able to give some guidance. I, for instance, was able to get some help from the original author of the XEmebed systray patch to help me get it in. I'm really rooting for you. If I can do it, I know you can. Just be patient and you'll pull through. :-) Hope this helps, James Liggett

Re: How works pGetAsyncKeyState?

2007-05-14 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 20:12 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > I can not find anywhere code writing any value to "pGetAsyncKeyState" > nor function that is executed when "pGetAsyncKeyState" is called. What you're looking at here is a function pointer to the driver that handles input for your windowing

Re: iphlpapi: Only call res_init() once per process

2007-04-19 Thread James Liggett
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 07:49 +0200, Kai Blin wrote: > On Wednesday 18 April 2007 20:39, Hans Leidekker wrote: > > +static int resolver_initialised; > > Shouldn't that be > > static int resolver_initilised = 0; > > here? I thought that in C, ints aren't initialized to 0 automatically. Actually I t

Re: We should have a .desktop file for the Uninstaller application

2007-02-25 Thread James Liggett
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 20:29 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: > As it is, most people don't even know this handy uninstaller applet > exists. So let's fix that. Good idea. And while we're at it, why not one for winecfg too? James

Re: systray icon questions

2007-01-02 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 11:33 +0300, Kirill K. Smirnov wrote > > I've tried kde, fluxbox and xfce4 (and fvwm, but it lacks systray). > Now I can see that xfce4 suffers from it. I did not noticed that before. > > So, I suppose a new patch (attached). Does it work correct with > GNOME? In xfce is O

Re: systray icon questions

2006-12-28 Thread James Liggett
Hi Krill, On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 13:14 +0300, Kirill K. Smirnov wrote: > > So the questions: > 1) Does systray icon helper window really need to be created with WS_CAPTION > style? Unfortunately, yes. The way the helper window is currently implemented, if you remove the WS_CAPTION style, the icon

Re: [TRY 3] Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-31 Thread James Liggett
Hi Kuba, > > What about a static variable right in the function where you call the > initialization function? That'd work fine if you don't call > InitCommonControlsEx from anywhere else: > > if (!list_head(&tray.icons)) > { > static BOOL controls_initialized = FALSE; > INITCOMMONCO

Re: [TRY 3] Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-30 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 15:37 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > Shouldn't you only initialize comctl32 once, rather than every time > there's no icons and we add one? Sure. I did it like this because Alexandre only wanted to have common controls initialized when we added an icon so we didn't have to do

Re: Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-26 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 13:00 +0300, Oleg Krylov wrote: > Next, we need to set tooltip max width, primarily to enable multiline > tooltips, as several applications relay on this. The code can be, just > after tooltip creation: > SendMessageW (icon->tooltip, TTM_SETMAXTIPWIDTH, 0, 400); > On windo

Re: Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-25 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 21:45 +0200, Frank Richter wrote: > AFAICS tooltip can contain multiple "tools". Each tool is given a > rectangle. So perhaps make one tool per icon, with matching rectangle? Yeah, they can do that. That's the easy part. The hard part is just managing the whole thing. Right n

Re: Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-25 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:19 +0200, Frank Richter wrote: > Hm, wouldn't it be more economic to try to use one tooltip for all icons? >From a purely memory-consumption standpoint, yes. But there are still issues with that. One is that we'd have to handle every mouse event to see where the cursor is t

Re: Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-25 Thread James Liggett
And BTW, the MSDN example is at http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/shellcc/platform/commctls/tooltip/tooltip.asp

Re: Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-25 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 13:00 +0300, Oleg Krylov wrote: > I've been working on the simmilar patch and I want make several > comments on the patch > > > + > > +/* create icon tooltip */ > > +icon->tooltip = CreateWindowEx(WS_EX_TOPMOST, TOOLTIPS_CLASS, NULL, > > +

Re: Regression with 'explorer' starting automatically by 'Process Explorer'

2006-08-23 Thread James Liggett
Hi Paul, > yes, the patch fixes the problem. > > Wasn't this as your original patch intended? AJ must have changed this for > a reason, if so. It was a part of one of my revisions; I got rid of it in the final version I sent just to make sure I wasn't taking any chances, as AJ has been aversive to

Re: Regression with 'explorer' starting automatically by 'Process Explorer'

2006-08-23 Thread James Liggett
Does this patch work for you? http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-August/030049.html

Re: Regression with 'explorer' starting automatically by 'Process Explorer'

2006-08-23 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:39 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: > Hi, > > normally when I start Process Explorer it automatically launches the > 'explorer' process. > > With the latest git 'explorer' crashes. Regression testing showed that > this is most likely due to the XEmbed patch: > > http://source.w

Re: Regression with 'explorer' starting automatically by 'Process Explorer'

2006-08-23 Thread James Liggett
it, so the patch moves it offscreen. Looks like the problem is with SetWindowPos. Seems like we're holding a lock and trying to acquire another one, and _CheckNotSysLevel doesn't like that and thus it throws a breakpoint. I'll check it out and see if I can get a fix. Thanks, James Liggett

[UPDATE 4] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patch

2006-08-16 Thread James Liggett
ted or not. 4. Consolidated all patches into one, as the individual patches weren't really individual changes. (Thanks to Mike McCormack for this advice.) As usual, comments/suggestions appreciated. Thanks again, James Liggett >From nobody Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Liggett <[E

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-15 Thread James Liggett
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:14 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > Great work! Now let's hope Alexandre accepts it. We're working on it. I talked about it briefly with Alexandre this morning on IRC. ATM he thinks I should get rid of the low-level checks for the systray windows. He suggested that I do somethin

RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-14 Thread James Liggett
uble. :) James >From nobody Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri Aug 11 13:13:19 2006 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] winex11.drv: Add XEmbed atom definitions to x11drv.h --- dlls/winex11.drv/x11drv.h |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 in

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-14 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 13:30 -0700, James Liggett wrote: > > also a problem where a window would dock but only be allocated 1 > > pixel, I think that was a bug in GNOME that is now fixed. > I'm not quite sure about that one--I've got an X test app that docks, > but

[UPDATE 3] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patches

2006-08-13 Thread James Liggett
Attached is the third update to the xembed systray patches. For this version I've simplified the if statements for checking if we should map tray icon windows or not (As per Scott Ritchie's advice--Thanks again Scott.) As always, further comments/suggestions appreciated. Thanks, Jam

Re: [UPDATE 2] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patches

2006-08-13 Thread James Liggett
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 13:39 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote: > The reason the two are logically equivalent is that the first condition > being false is implied when you're looking on the other side of the or > statement, meaning that X11DRV_get_systray_window( display ) MUST not be > None if we're even

Re: [UPDATE 2] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patches

2006-08-13 Thread James Liggett
I also forgot to add these other changes: 3. Patched server changes against server/protocol.def as per Juan Lang's advice. 4. With more testing, I found that the XSync call has no effect on the reliability of the docking. As Alexandre says they're a bad idea in this case, I just got rid of that pa

[UPDATE 2] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patches

2006-08-12 Thread James Liggett
s now. But, if you look at the patches, you'll notice that the logic in the if statements is a little ugly. Is there a cleaner way to do this? Thanks, James Liggett xembed-systray-3.tar.gz Description: application/compressed-tar

Re: [UPDATE] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patches

2006-08-11 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 09:02 -0700, Juan Lang wrote: > +wine_tsx11_lock(); > +/* set XEMBED protocol data on the window */ > +info[0] = 0; /* protocol version */ > +info[1] = 1; /* mapped = true */ > +XChangeProperty( display, data->whole_window, > +

[UPDATE] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patches

2006-08-10 Thread James Liggett
ne, then we map them. Would adding a function like that to x11drv be a good idea? Any comments/suggestions/test results highly appreciated. If you'd like to test these, apply them in the order that they're numbered (should go from 0001 to 0010.) Thanks again, James Liggett xembed-systray-patches-2.tar.gz Description: application/compressed-tar

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-10 Thread James Liggett
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 00:16 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > You can always stick some needed field in the X11DRV private data (you > can see how to access that in the code itself). OK--I apologize for being so dumb. it's the server reply that needs the extended styles field, not X11DRV_win_data. Sorry t

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-09 Thread James Liggett
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 00:16 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > > You can always stick some needed field in the X11DRV private data (you > can see how to access that in the code itself). Are you referring to x11drv_win_data? I looked at that, but it seems cleaner if I just use GetWindowLongW. I don't know

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-09 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 12:16 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > Ah awesome, good work! I know when I looked at this originally it > seemed you could set a flag that told the embedder whether it was > already mapped or not, maybe that doesn't work properly. It's not that it doesn't work properly. What happe

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-08 Thread James Liggett
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:48 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > > It's not that we need to slow it down - slowing something down is > never an acceptable solution to a race. We are missing some kind of > synchronisation somewhere, > Actually, I don't think it has to do with synchronization--I think it

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-07 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:02 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:10:19 -0700, James Liggett wrote: > > so I suspect that this has something to do with stack problem > > More likely it's a speed issue - logging slows the code down a lot which > could "fix&

Re: RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-07 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:02 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:10:19 -0700, James Liggett wrote: > > so I suspect that this has something to do with stack problem > > More likely it's a speed issue - logging slows the code down a lot which > could "fix&

RFC: XEmbed Systray Patches

2006-08-06 Thread James Liggett
. I'd appreciate it if someone could give me some assistance on tracking down this issue. If you'd like to test these, please apply them in the order that they're numbered. Any comments/suggestions appreciated. Thnaks, James Liggett [1]: http://code.google.com/wine.html [2]: htt

Re: "IE5 or higher required". Grr.

2006-03-11 Thread James Liggett
I must really say I agree with you here, Jeremy. I think what Dan is doing for wine is excellent, and I for one appreciate him keeping us abreast of his efforts and the problems he encounters. The apps he's working with are really important for a lot of people, and as such they probably need our at

Re: Threading performance

2006-01-21 Thread James Liggett
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 17:37 -0600, Evil wrote: > Hi all, > > I was just playing around with the Video Stress Test in CounterStrike: > Source, and noted a lot of odd stuttering. The demo would run for about > 15 seconds at 13fps, then completely freeze up for about 15 seconds. > Then, it would st

Re: debugging help

2005-12-24 Thread James Liggett
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 10:04 -0500, Robert Reif wrote: > I'm trying to help someone on wine-bugs > (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4053) with a crash in a game. > > The problem is that the game is catching and displaying the exception. > It also appears that the game won't run in winedbg

Re: Steam Winsock regression

2005-12-20 Thread James Liggett
ily 0 fixme:winsock:convert_proto_w2u unhandled Windows socket protocol 0 I hope they prove to be useful. James On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:39 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 11:26:01PM -0800, James Liggett wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 07:56 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote

Re: Steam Winsock regression

2005-12-20 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 23:38 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Actually, I meant it might be a security issue for 2 reasons. The first > is that taking out other machines is obviously a problem. The second, > however, was that you reported it took out the internet of the machine > Wine was running on

Re: Steam Winsock regression

2005-12-19 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 10:00 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > I don't think Scott meant it that way ;-) > Who cares about Wine, here's a change that makes half the machines in the > network lose connection randomly, that's much bigger things to worry about > potentially than simply non-working Wine sock

Re: Steam Winsock regression

2005-12-19 Thread James Liggett
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 23:50 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:35 -0800, James Liggett wrote: > > Hi, > > For a while now I've been noticing a very bad regression in winsock with > > steam. If I try to view information about a server using the "

Re: Steam Winsock regression

2005-12-19 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:39 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 11:26:01PM -0800, James Liggett wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 07:56 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:35:34PM -0800, James Liggett wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: Steam Winsock regression

2005-12-18 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 07:56 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:35:34PM -0800, James Liggett wrote: > > Hi, > > For a while now I've been noticing a very bad regression in winsock with > > steam. If I try to view information about a server usi

Steam Winsock regression

2005-12-18 Thread James Liggett
Hi, For a while now I've been noticing a very bad regression in winsock with steam. If I try to view information about a server using the "View game info command," my Internet connection fails completely. Not only that, but sometimes *all* of the machines on my network (both WinXP and Linux) lose t

Re: [wined3d] Converting Wined3d to use WGL instead of GLX

2005-12-17 Thread James Liggett
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 07:07 +, Aric Cyr wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion, but I already have wine compiled with only "-g". > Last time I checked gcc doesn't enable optimizations unless a -O option is > specified explicitly (don't know if this has changed though). > > Anyways, I think I f

Re: [wined3d] Converting Wined3d to use WGL instead of GLX

2005-12-15 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 02:08 +, Aric Cyr wrote: > Aric Cyr gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I debugged it more last night and I found the offending call. If I comment > > out > > just that one (probably unneeded from what I can tell) function everything > > works > > great. > > Replying to my

Re: Create new mailing list wine-isv?

2005-12-15 Thread James Liggett
> I really fear that this will end up with vendors loudly advertising linux > support and > proudly putting linux stickers on their products where everything you find > inside are just > the same windows .exe files and a readme stating that these will work fine > with wine. > Which at least i

Re: [opengl] WGL_render_texture / WGL_ATI_pixel_format_float

2005-12-05 Thread James Liggett
With this demo and the patch I get the same problem that Toan is getting. (With an ATI Radeon 9800 pro, latest drivers) James On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 01:25 +0100, Raphael wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone Can test this demo > http://www.paulsprojects.net/opengl/rtotex/rtotex.html > If have an ATI card who

Re: Why Steam fails

2005-12-05 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 03:24 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > I think hardware problems with the RAM are highly unlikely. I've had > plenty of those, and when your RAM is defective, nothing works - you get > spurious kernel panics, and you will find out that it's defective > really soon. Well, that

Re: Why Steam fails

2005-12-03 Thread James Liggett
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 15:02 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > Stefan Dösinger wrote: > > Hello, > > > >> It doesn't seem to check the retval of the first alloc, which fails > >> about half of the time in > >> wine_anon_mmap (mmap() call) with ENOMEM. If the allocation succeeds, > >> Steam proceeds t

Re: wine/ dlls/wldap32/control.c dlls/wldap32/init ...

2005-11-24 Thread James Liggett
Yet another wldap32 build problem. Such fun. :) Fortunately, Mike McCormack sent a patch to wine-patches that fixes it: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-November/022350.html Hope this helps, James On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 19:15 +0100, Rein Klazes wrote: > Hi, > >Modified files: > >

Re: problem compiling value.c in /home/storri/src/wine/dlls/wldap32

2005-11-19 Thread James Liggett
Yeah, I ran into that last night. A patch to fix it was submitted to wine-patches, but it hasn't been committed yet: http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-November/022242.html Hope this helps, James On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 19:21 -0600, Stephen Torri wrote: > I am using CVS version of wi

Re: Steam regression in CVS

2005-11-19 Thread James Liggett
I applied last night to my tree. It fixes the problem. Thanks. James On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 15:52 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:39:23AM -0600, Evil wrote: > > I can confirm this. I see the same error since the patch. > > I have sent in a fix already but it was not ap

Steam regression in CVS

2005-11-19 Thread James Liggett
Hi, Yesterday I found a regression in Steam in current CVS. It fails to start, giving the error message: "ERROR: Failed to get local IP address of SocketToServer." Steam dies a few seconds after this. I tracked down the cause to a recent Winsock patch: http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-cvs/2005-

Re: Question about contents of STARTUPINFO structure and non WinMain entry points

2005-11-11 Thread James Liggett
Yeah, it works. :) Thanks! James On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 21:17 +0100, Eric Pouech wrote: > > I tried modifying the RTL_USER_PROCESS_PARAMATERS settings after > > creation in dlls/ntdll/thread.c (in thread_init, right after the > > structure is allocated,) but that didn't work. So I put the change i

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-11-09 Thread James Liggett
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 11:32 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: > I have to Julliard regarding this, he still thinks that there should > be some more work to be done on it. He did not mentioned what work is > to be done. Yeah, I have as well. He's yet to return my e-mail on that one. > Well you shoul

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-11-09 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:26 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: > I have tested googletalk with the patch of yours, i am attaching the > screenshot of it. > whenever i ve closed an googletalk instance its present on the screen > (in the picture i have labelled it as zombie), in ps -ef its not > killin

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-11-09 Thread James Liggett
Kamuju wrote: > could you please send a new patch as per latest cvs or 0.9 > I would like to test this patch. > with 0.9 its not applying properly > Thanks, > Vijay > > On 10/27/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 14:3

Re: Question about contents of STARTUPINFO structure and non WinMain entry points

2005-11-08 Thread James Liggett
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:43 +0100, Eric POUECH wrote: > you likely have to fix dlls/ntdll/thread.c (in thread_init) so that > the RTL_USER_PROCESS_PARAMETERS has the correct flag set (or > alternatively, in dlls/kernel/process.c, in for example > build_initial_environment) I tried modifying the RTL

Question about contents of STARTUPINFO structure and non WinMain entry points

2005-11-07 Thread James Liggett
Hi, First, apologies for the length. It's quite a complex issue: A few days ago someone sent to the list asking why a program he'd written on WinXP runs under WineDbg but not under plain wine. Over the weekend I debugged the program and found out that his program doesn't use the standard WinMain e

Re: program works under winedbg but not under wine

2005-11-01 Thread James Liggett
Usually if something works under a debugger but not normally, that means there's some sort of stack problem. Does your program work perfectly on Windows? On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 20:57 -0200, Matheus Izvekov wrote: > Hi all > > This program works (with some small issues, but not really a problem > f

Re: Half-Life 2 / Counter-Strike: Source under Wine

2005-10-31 Thread James Liggett
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 15:00 +, Oliver Stieber wrote: > I've got quite a few optimizations to check-in, but I don't think it's a good > idea putting in > optimizations that may break things until wined3d is stable enough that bugs > in wined3d don't go > on to break the optimizations. I agree

Re: Half-Life 2 / Counter-Strike: Source under Wine

2005-10-30 Thread James Liggett
The textures on the monoliths were always plain and flat when I > was running Cedega. I'm tempted to renew my Cedega subscription to make > sure I'm remembering right. Yeah, I know what you mean. I've never been a fan of Cedega, so I say to hell with it. I would stick with f

Re: Half-Life 2 / Counter-Strike: Source under Wine

2005-10-29 Thread James Liggett
I have single player HL2 running decent. Not quite excellent, but playable. Try running steam with this command: WINEDEBUG="-all" wine steam.exe And you should get anywhere from 10-30 FPS. It's not the best in the world, but at least you can play. :) I have started a new game, and I am now in the

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-10-26 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 14:33 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > I'm afraid it's too big a change to get in at this point. Besides, > there are still problems with that patch. Now that 0.9 is released and the freeze is over, can you please tell me what the problems are so I can fix them? Thanks, J

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-10-19 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 15:51 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:33:02PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1301 is in Wine 0.9 blocker list. > > > I guess this patch should go

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-10-19 Thread James Liggett
I'm afraid it's too big a change to get in at this point. Besides, > there are still problems with that patch. Which problems are you referring to? It's true that there are some issues with it, but those (at least in my testing anyway) are limited to Gnome. With other desktops, such as XFce and Ice

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-10-18 Thread James Liggett
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 15:05 -0500, James Hawkins wrote: > On 10/18/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anything wrong with this patch? (Resent version) > > > > We're in a feature freeze right now till 0.9 is released. I would try > submitting ag

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-10-18 Thread James Liggett
Anything wrong with this patch? (Resent version) James Liggett On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:07 -0700, James Liggett wrote: > Hi, > This patch implements XEmbed system tray support for recent non-KDE > desktops. This is a modified version of a patch originally submitted by > Rob Shear

Re: Release plans

2005-10-02 Thread James Liggett
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 20:18 +, Molle Bestefich wrote: > Brian Vincent wrote: > > Anyway, the filename here has "demo" in it, so I'm not sure if this is > > the full IDA Pro everyone has used in the past. > > http://www.download.com/IDA-The-Interactive-Disassembler/3000-2218_4-10361515.html?tag=

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-09-23 Thread James Liggett
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 12:07 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Also what's > the reason for having an XSync here? The XSync call is in the example on freedeskotop.org for showing how to send client messages (http://standards.freedesktop.org/systemtray-spec/systemtray-spec-0.2.html#messages) uses

Running Wine from source tree

2005-09-21 Thread James Liggett
Hi, I'm doing a lot of testing, and I was wondering if I can run Wine from within its source tree without having to reinstall it after every build. If it can be done without conflicting with an existing installation of Wine, how do I do it? Thanks, James

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-09-21 Thread James Liggett
Adding the locking fixes the problem about icons not docking properly that I described in one of my posts yesterday. It's much better now. James On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 13:58 -0500, Robert Shearman wrote: > Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > >Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >>+

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

2005-09-20 Thread James Liggett
Aside from the bugs I've mentioned before, it doesn't seem that the implementation of this works quite right. This patch should address the bugs in dlls/shell32/systray.c, not just the docking. I've fixed most things, but there is still one big problem. There's a window cleanup problem where the fi

Re: XEmbed systray patch bugs

2005-09-20 Thread James Liggett
Ok that's good. I've been looking through the systray code myself, and its quite messy... Have fun! ;-) James On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 16:23 -0500, Robert Shearman wrote: > James Liggett wrote: > > >1. The "Wine-Systray" window is still showing up. I've been

XEmbed systray patch bugs

2005-09-18 Thread James Liggett
Hi Mike and Rob, I tried your patch for XEmbed systray support, and I'm pretty impressed with it. I think it's about time someone finally dusted this one off and tried to get it committed. But, I've noticed some issues: 1. The "Wine-Systray" window is still showing up. I've been able to fix this b

Re: Internet Explorer Registry entries

2005-09-14 Thread James Liggett
Hi Stefan, I agree. I personally thought this would have been done long ago. But, in order to fully implement this functinality, wouldn't we have to implement some more dll's (like shdoc401 and some others that I don't know off the top of my head?) The reason I ask this is that some programs (like

Re: DirectX status update....

2005-09-06 Thread James Liggett
This is some excellent news! Kudos and keep up the great work :) James On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 21:21 +0100, Oliver Stieber wrote: > I though it was about time I gave a status update on DirectX9/wined3d, so > here goes. > > Short of a couple of bug fixes (one to shaders, and another that cause

Possible theming bug?

2005-08-30 Thread James Liggett
Hi, Yesterday I updated CVS and tried the new theme system. While I find it very impressive, I think I may have discovered a glaring problem with it. I copied the WinXP "Luna" theme from my XP partition into the Resources folder as directed by this week's WWN issue. It showed up in the Appearances

Re: Possible critical section bug - lock by invalid thread

2005-08-29 Thread James Liggett
I also see this in PokerStars.NET (an online poker game) In my case, I believe the threads are valid however. I'll check on that and get back to you. I notice it after playing the game for about a half-hour, sometimes a bit longer. When this happens, I also noticed that I can barely move my mouse,

Re: IDA Pro Regression

2005-08-28 Thread James Liggett
Hi Robbert, I tried a fresh CVS copy today, and IDA works now. I guess it got fixed. That was fast... :) I wonder if your installers will work now. James On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:40 +0100, Robbert Xerox wrote: > Hi, same patch is causing a regression in quite a few > installers; one of them is: >

Re: IDA Pro Regression

2005-08-27 Thread James Liggett
Hi, A week or so ago I reported some regressions running IDA pro on wine. I've done some regression testing and I have found the patches that were causing the problems. The first problem I noticed were the large edit boxes in the General Registers window in IDA's debugger. It was caused by this edi

Re: Crash on glBegin() (Was: Help with debugging needed)

2005-08-22 Thread James Liggett
Hi Stefan, > Now I've run into the next problem: Any call to glBegin(GL_Something) crashes > in the libs of my OpenGL driver(ATI fglrx) due to some NULL pointer > access[1]. If I disable Hardware Acceleration, the crash doesn't occur and > Empire Earth starts up to the Main Menu more or less su

IDA Pro regression

2005-08-19 Thread James Liggett
m? Thanks very much, James Liggett

Re: WineHQ: Default font

2005-08-16 Thread James Liggett
I agree. Bitstream Vera looks awful with antialiasing turned off. (using Freetype bytecode interpreter) I've been wishing that the font be changed to something more generic (I also thing Arial would work good) for about a year now. James On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 02:57 +0200, Christian Britz wrote: >

Re: Help with debugging needed

2005-08-13 Thread James Liggett
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 22:15 +, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > I indeed was in doubt that ddraw or dinput are causing the problem, and I > didn't find anything wrong in the DDraw code. Well, I'll see. > > BTW, Empire Earth crashes in exactly the same way in Cedega, where I expect > the DirectX imp

Re: Help with debugging needed

2005-08-13 Thread James Liggett
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 22:35 +, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Samstag, 13. August 2005 19:34 schrieb Lionel Ulmer: > > > This looks like a really nasty heap corruption to me, and I'm afraid it's > > > beyond my knowledge. Can anyone of the ddraw/d3d people help me? > > > > I think best would a +dd

Re: Help with debugging needed

2005-08-11 Thread James Liggett
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 21:39 +, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Hello, > I am trying(once again) to get Empire Earth [1] running with wine. After > solving a few problems[2], I've run into a strange access violation crash. It > looks like a buffer overrun, followed by a return to an invalid adress. >

Re: Patch to fix GetCommState "Invalid Argument" errors with Linux usbserial devices

2005-08-04 Thread James Liggett
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 14:28 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > James Liggett wrote: > > > This patch fixes an "Invalid Argument" error in GetCommState when a > > program tries to get information about a usbserial device. With this > > patch, Wine provides a "

Re: Wine-Systray and XEMBED

2005-08-01 Thread James Liggett
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 01:34 +0200, Christian Britz wrote: > James Liggett schrieb: > > > I use a few programs that use systray icons. Because I use GNOME, these > > icons don't show up as tray icons as they should, but instead as little > > Could you please prov

Wine-Systray and XEMBED

2005-08-01 Thread James Liggett
ndard to get the systray to work in both GNOME and KDE. There haven't been any updates to its status for quite a while now. Does anyone know of the status on this work? Thanks, James Liggett

Re: Progress with syncing a Palm with Palm Desktop

2005-08-01 Thread James Liggett
Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 05:03:14PM -0700, James Liggett wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > Over the past few weeks, I have been working on syncing a Palm with Palm > > > Desktop and Hotsync with WINE. I have made some progress in this > > > endeavor. I am successfully ab

Progress with syncing a Palm with Palm Desktop

2005-07-31 Thread James Liggett
ome feedback on my changes so that it can be useful, and possibly submitted for inclusion in CVS. If anyone's interested, I have a screenshot in the AppDB: http://appdb.winehq.org/screenshots.php?appId=688&versionId=1043. Thanks a lot, James Liggett I

Half-Life 2 Regression

2005-07-31 Thread James Liggett
x27;t notice this problem before. Anyone else notice it? Thanks a lot, James Liggett

Re: Flush serial port

2005-07-31 Thread James Liggett
before it works again. Maybe a flush is necessary after all. Might the corrected patch help the problem? ;-) James Liggett On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 16:12 +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > >>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > &g

Re: Another AppDB screenshot problem...

2005-07-28 Thread James Liggett
shots.php?appId=1383&versionId=1873 > > Apparently, Apache 2 in Red Hat has it's PHP4 configured with a limit of > 512K on uploads. I had to change the "LimitRequestBody" setting in: > /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf > > It should be fixed now. > > On Wed, 200

Re: Another AppDB screenshot problem...

2005-07-27 Thread James Liggett
Hi Tony, Thanks so much for looking into this. Hope it gets fixed soon ;-) James On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 21:35 -0600, Tony Lambregts wrote: > James Liggett wrote: > > Hi, > > Tonight I tried to submit a shot for Palm Desktop 4.1 and it gave me > > this error: > > &g

  1   2   >