wcrtomb wcscat wcscpy wcsncat
wcsncpy wcsnrtombs wcsrtombs wcstombs wctomb wmemcpy wmemmove wmempcpy
wmemset wprintf
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
for
> that.
Okay, cool. That should probably be noted somewhere in the FAQ. Also,
perhaps the lz tests should be updated as well, since they are regularly
mentioned as the basic example developers should work from.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
d for doing the build with the free-of-charge windows
CLI compiler (which the "STANDALONE" stuff works fine with).
Is there some new way to build standalone tests, or should I send a
patch for re-including the #ifndef STANDALONE stuff for the tests?
ect something is in the registry. I will
investigate.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:29:58PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Take two.
Ignore... this patch is broken, and I need to do an update of
wine_dbg_printf() -> MESSAGE()
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
peopl have already turned on trace/warn, or immediately following a
FIXME that includes a path. I just want to use it for the readability
of the structure.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
+}
>
> You should use the TRACE/FIXME macros here, not raw wine_dbg_printf.
FIXME is sane for the "announce_bad_opaque_data", but I'd still like to
use something that doesn't prefix the hexdumps with the function name
for easier readability in the crypt_report_func_input, since there is
already a TRACE/FIXME call being made prior to it's call. Is this okay?
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
f arranged in some other way. I'm all ears
for suggestions. :)
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
y the Crypt* family of API's in advapi32.dll. All that is
> necessary for this to implement should be available in wine already.
Cool, that's good news. I haven't had the chance to review that stuff
yet.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
winapi_stats page say it's at "21%".
Thanks for all the clarification. I appreciate it!
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
ossible, hence my desire to make the dialogs never
display, not require X11, etc. I need the dialog to think it's running,
though.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:38:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> YOu could trap it#s onshow event but be careful since most dlgs are
> created as modal , you could end up hanging your process.
How would I go about capturing that? (Or, how would I hook the event
handler?)
--
Kee
drv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x7d, 0x76d3501c, 128): stub
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
ally click "Ok" on a dialog box?
(The dialog box coming from code that I don't have source for...)
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
and
CryptUnprotectData. (The existing patches intentionally avoid
any encryption.)
>From looking at Wine's configure.ac, it seems safe to depend on openssl
being available. Is that correct?
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
I don't like the ssh-agent idea because not everyone uses ssh-agent. If
inventing a data format and XORing stuff is prefered, I can write it
that way.
What direction should I take this?
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
API call it's a usual
> practice
> to set the error first to some invalid value, 0xdeadbeef works fine.
Added.
Thanks for all the suggestions from everyone! I'm glad you're willing
to put up with me. :) Take 4 on it's way.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
) == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, "error returned
> incorrect\n");
Ah-ha, I need to make calls to SetLastError then. I wasn't doing that
either. Okay, 3rd time's the charm. This patch includes full
documentation, as well as the test s
What's the convention for the number after the API name? I've seen some
with numbers, and some with just an "@" sign?
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:24:53PM -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> ChangeLog
> Remove reference to nonexistant strmif.h
> +++ include/Makefile.in 5 Apr 2005 02:23:26 -
> - strmif.h \
/src/wine-cvs/include$ ls strmif.h
strmif.h
? it's there for me.
e sending "version 2" of my patch in a little while. It's got
your suggestions incorporated, and a small bug fix.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
n't use C99 style variable
> declarations.
Ah, dang. I tried to clean those up too when I was reading the Patch
how-to. I'll clean all this up, thanks very much!
BTW: what is your opinion on where to store the triplets in the
Registry?
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
in is the big
> first step. I just think we should get a community opinion on this
> matter (ya never know, everyone may disagree with me!). Keep up the
> good coding.
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:04:53PM -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2005 10:12 PM, Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To store the triplets, these functions use the registry:
> >
> > Registry Layout:
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\
24 matches
Mail list logo
