On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Keith Muir wrote:
Recently read the thread on the poor quality of the ratings but changing
the wording isn't going to have much of an effect. A properly structured
questionnaire that then suggests a rating will.
Something like a simple rule-based system (platinum =
Hi!
The following commit breaks sound in (at least) Prince of Persia SoT and
PoP TWW. Reece, let me know how I can help with that.
commit ce06de420874b9983324508f8257a580fee341ca
Author: Reece Dunn mscl...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon Dec 22 13:33:43 2008 +
dsound: Correct the dsound
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Austin English wrote:
In the winecfg drive tab, advanced drive settings (setting label and serial)
seem to be broken currently due to other Wine bugs (see drive.c
apply_drive_changes comments). Disable these settings for now since this
only confuses users.
[...]
Rather
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Austin English wrote:
What about clarifying the wording on
http://appdb.winehq.org/help/?sTopic=maintainer_ratings
?
My suggestion for Platinum:
Application installs and runs flawlessly completely/at highest settings
'out of the box'. No changes required in winecfg.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Austin English wrote:
If I had a nickel for every times I've seen platinum and gold ratings
for apps that had dozens of native dlls or complicated scripts to work
around wine bugs, I'd be a much richer man.
What about clarifying the wording on
