2009/4/11 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com:
2009/4/11 Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com:
2009/4/11 James Hawkins trui...@gmail.com:
Let met explain :
Running test on wine in folder C:\test : works (expected C:\test got
C:\test)
Running test on wine in folder C:\ : works (expected C:\ got C
doesn't change anything.
After reading a little bit about how this works I don't see anything
wrong. Perhaps you will.
thanks,
Nicolas Le Cam
to cope with that, if need be.
Should should ?
+ */
+ res = RegOpenKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER,
Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Internet
Settings\\Zones\\3, hkey);
if(res != ERROR_SUCCESS) {
ok(0, Could not open zone key\n);
--
Nicolas Le Cam
2009/4/4 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Define PT_FOLDERW in pidl.h to complete this series.
You're changing the indent of some of the defines. If you're going to
change some, change them all to make them
2009/4/4 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/4 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Define PT_FOLDERW in pidl.h to complete
2009/3/19 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
Try2: Follow Vincent Povirk's suggestion of removing calls to
SetWindowLongPtr before destroying windows
Could someone test this patch on Win9x or WinNT ?
On Win2k (and according to test.winehq.org on above platforms
2009/3/18 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
On Win2k (and according to test.winehq.org on above platforms) an
ABN_POSCHANGED message is sent to the last window that is removed.
This patch change the ok to a win_skip in this case.
Tell me if you have a better
2009/3/18 Vincent Povirk madewokherd+8...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Tell me if you have a better solution.
You should add some traces first to find out what window is getting
this notification and when. The test data currently
2009/3/18 Vincent Povirk madewokherd+8...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Win2k after the last SHAppBarMessage(ABM_REMOVE, abd) call, a
ABN_POSCHANGED is sent to windows[2].hwnd, but at that time user data
has been set to null
2009/3/18 Vincent Povirk madewokherd+8...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think calling SHAppBarMessage with ABM_REMOVE destroy the
window and the ABN_POSCHANGED notification is catched between this
call and the DestroyWindow one
2009/3/18 Vincent Povirk madewokherd+8...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Message notification comes from appbar3, I've checked hwnd handles.
When calling last ABM_REMOVE there's no more appbars so Wine shouldn't
send any notifications
2009/3/18 Vincent Povirk madewokherd+8...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, did more testing ...
It seems you're right, adding a do_events() call after each
DestroyWindow() one seems to fix the test on Win2k.
Do you think
logname;
}
I did a similar patch yesterday but forget to set PATH around run_ex
in get_subtests so it didn't work when I tested on my W2K Pro test
platform.
Thanks for your work
--
Nicolas Le Cam
+
+ /* We have a dll that cannot be found through
LoadLibraryExA.
This
+ * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
directory
+ * where the dll resides to the PATH variable when dealing
with
+ * the tests for this dll.
+
2009/2/25 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
+
+ /* We have a dll that cannot be found through
LoadLibraryExA.
This
+ * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
directory
+ * where the dll resides to the PATH
);
--
1.6.0.6
What about extending wine_test struct with a path variable that will
be set and restored around the CreateProcess call in run_ex if not
null ?
--
Nicolas Le Cam
2009/2/23 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
This avoid a messagebox in regression tests on systems that don't have
GdiPlus.
This seems wrong because winetest.exe is already supposed to check for
missing dlls. If I remember correctly this was done
2009/2/23 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
2009/2/23 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
This avoid a messagebox in regression tests on systems that don't have
GdiPlus.
This seems wrong because winetest.exe is already
2009/2/23 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Is .NET installed (any version)?
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Can't remember. I will check and report back this evening.
Nicolas Le Cam
2009/2/23 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
2009/2/23 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
2009/2/23 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
This avoid a messagebox in regression tests on systems
2009/2/21 Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de:
On Do, 2009-02-19 at 16:21 -0800, James Hawkins wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de wrote:
James: A fixed path is broken by design.
A Thanks for spending weeks of your time laboriously testing and
implementing
2009/2/18 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Building today crosstests I've got:
i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include
-g -O2 -o inputprocessor.cross.o inputprocessor.c
i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include
-g -O2 -o
2009/2/19 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
2009/2/18 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Building today crosstests I've got:
i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include
-g -O2 -o inputprocessor.cross.o inputprocessor.c
i586-mingw32msvc
2009/2/20 Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de:
James: A fixed path is broken by design.
This fix the remaining failure on w2k.
The asmcache has more failures on win9x, but a fix for that
failures conflict with the patchset from Hans.
--
By by ... Detlef
Hi Detlef,
I've already sent
2008/11/6 Nicolas Le Cam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
DeviceCapabilities DC_FIELDS always sets the DM_FORMNAME flag.
Mark this test as a todo_wine.
Nicolas Le Cam
Is there something wrong with this one ?
Should I fix wine too ? I didn't because I don't know where to fix it
(in winspool.drv
2008/11/4 Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas Le Cam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@@ -614,7 +614,9 @@ static void test_enum_provider_types(void)
DWORD dwTypeCount;
/* actual values */
- DWORD index = 0;
+ /* the first provider type registry key may not have
Hi,
Should I consider second solution ?
Or perhaps adding a comment explaining why we use the second provider
type key would be enough ?
Original patch is available at [1] for reference.
[1] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-October/063475.html
Bye,
Nicolas Le Cam
2008/10/20
2008/10/23 Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Captchas in general are not so good, and there are much better
anti-spam techniques out there (Such as asking an actual question.
There are phpbb mods which allow you to input a list of questions
(with perhaps links to wiki pages with answers)
Sorry for the truncated object, certainly a copy/paste error.
It should be: Make the shlwapi tests load on systems Vista by
providing a private implementation of RegDeleteTreeW.
Regards,
Nicolas Le Cam
Hi Paul,
I've just seen that. Please ignore my patch. I've followed the same
'trick' that has been used in other tests but I also think Detlef's
approach is better.
Thanks for your feedback,
Nicolas Le Cam
2008/10/20 Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
Regards,
Nicolas Le
Sorry again, didn't see Detlef has already sent a fix to this one [1].
Please ignore.
Regards,
Nicolas Le Cam
[1] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-October/063319.html
2008/10/20 Nicolas Le Cam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry for the truncated object, certainly a copy/paste error
Its obvious but don't apply, third patch is missing comment and unused
variables cleaning. I will submit a new patch later.
regards,
Nicolas Le Cam
2008/10/17 Nicolas Le Cam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
This path series intend to fix a failing test on localized windows
version.
The first two
(resent as I didn't cc to wine-devel)
Tested on win2k sp4 :
X:\kernel32_crosstest.exe profile
profile: 202 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.
2008/9/14 Erik Inge Bolsø [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone run this testcase on native windows for me, please? :)
Same thing here with a 2k box running on VirtualBox.
2008/8/31 Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Hawkins wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I just sent a few patches that fix the problem with the timeout on my
machines.
Do you think
LINGUISTIC_IGNORECASE and other new definitions and try to
implement handling of those new flags in CompareString but IMHO it's a
different task.
2008/7/21 Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas Le Cam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vista introduced new flags for CompareString, as stated in [1
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
