[PATCH] winspool.drv: Fallback to the first found printer as default printer [try 2]

2007-07-04 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
--- dlls/winspool.drv/info.c |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Detlef Riekenberg wrote: Sorry, I misinterpreted the Patch because of the subject. I'm fine with your Patch, when you fix your typo: +if (hadprinter !haddefault) +

Re: [PATCH] WINSPOOL.DRV: Choose first printer found as the default

2007-07-03 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
Detlef Riekenberg wrote: On Di, 2007-07-03 at 14:06 -0300, Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr. wrote: # [PATCH] WINSPOOL.DRV: Choose first printer found as the default Why do you think, that you need this? Different default Printers (CUPS and Wine) confuse most Users. Unless I'm mistaken: 1. The patch

Enforcing charset/codepage (was: Commit 37591409b28c2000e70bd0d3c654a3a7559a4a26 breaks accentuation)

2007-04-26 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
Follow-up... I recall that forcing the charset to be ANSI_CHARSET instead of DEFAULT_CHARSET [1] fixed bug 7571 [2] here, and from that rose an idea: would it be possible to add an option to winecfg to enforce a particular charset/codepage, much like it is already done in web browsers? That way,

Re: Regression in Lotus Notes R5 between wine-0.9.27 and wine-0.9.28

2007-03-06 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
On 3/6/07, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try this patch: diff --git a/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c b/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c index bd9c16c..23b6cfd 100644 --- a/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c +++ b/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c Yeah, that dit it; thanks! Can I expect to see this in 0.9.33, then?

Commit 37591409b28c2000e70bd0d3c654a3a7559a4a26 breaks accentuation

2007-02-27 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
Hi all, After some regression testing, I found out that commit 37591409b28c2000e70bd0d3c654a3a7559a4a26 by Dmitry Timoshkov breaks accentuation - at least for Brazilian Portuguese in Lotus Notes R5. I did some testing and found out that only TrueType fonts are affected - that is, the fonts

Re: Commit 37591409b28c2000e70bd0d3c654a3a7559a4a26 breaks accentuation

2007-02-27 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
On 2/27/07, Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please open a bug report regarding this problem, with all the appropriate info: an aplication that shows the problem, the fonts used, etc. If you could add a test to the existing tests in the above mentioned commit that shows the problem that

Re: Bug 50

2007-02-13 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
Hi all, I'm writing just to ask why my patch and test case for Bug 50 (the text justification issue) weren't committed yet, so that I can take the proper measures in order that they can be. Regards, Pedro.

Re: Test case for Bug 50 [Was: Bug 50]

2007-01-29 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
I've just finished writing a test case for Bug 50, but I'm missing *a single thing* that prevents it from working under Windows: I still don't know how to get the width of the text output by ExtTextOutW(). MSDN isn't helping much, and I haven't found the optimal Google query yet... ;-) Would

Re: Test case for Bug 50 [Was: Bug 50]

2007-01-29 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
On 2007-01-29, Duane Clark wrote: GetTextExtentPoint32 For some examples in Wine, look at almost any control in comctl32. I was afraid somebody would answer that... Thanks for the quick reply, but that isn't exactly what I need. Here's the picture: when an application calls TextOut() for

Re: Test case for Bug 50 [Was: Bug 50]

2007-01-12 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
Update... I thought I had managed to get Keith's idea and make up a patch, but, to great grief -- and not so great a surprise --, I have just discovered that my patch for bug 50 is not as effective on Lotus Notes 6.5.3 as it was in Notes R5 and the Petzold justify1 example. Well, I'm checking

Re: Test case for Bug 50 [Was: Bug 50]

2007-01-10 Thread Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr.
I think I've managed to patch [1] bug 50 [2], but I'm having a little trouble coming up with a proper test case... I'm already at it, studying and investigating, but could someone test that, too? [1] http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=4543action=view [2]