On Sunday 10 October 2010 18:43:25 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 03:42 AM, Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
> > I haven't found out how to do this properly yet and i think that i
> > definitely need help on that one (like an example) as my skills in C are
> > not tha
On Sunday 10 October 2010 00:26:45 you wrote:
> On 10/09/2010 12:37 PM, Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
> >>> +static SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION cached_lpi[1024];
> >>
> >> You think there are systems with that many CPUs running Wine?
> >
> >
>> +static SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION cached_lpi[1024];
>You think there are systems with that many CPUs running Wine?
I honestly don't know the array is currently large enough to support
146 CPU's with 4 unique Caches (L1i,L1d,L2,L3), each in it's own
processorpackage and numa node. Thi
>On Friday 08 October 2010 14:26:28 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Rudolf Mayerhofer writes:
>> > +/***
>> > + * Several methods to retrieve data from SysFS (/sys)
>> > + * used to
On Friday 08 October 2010 14:26:28 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Rudolf Mayerhofer writes:
> > +/***
> > + * Several methods to retrieve data from SysFS (/sys)
> > + * used to retrieve cached
> Have you checked that it doesn't just return a
> SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION ? It seems to be the right
> "format" for the name anyway. I'd play with the size argument or try
> using NtQuerySystemInformationEx (some new thing in win7). You could
> just find a case that passes and impleme
>I don't know much about kernel32/ntdll, but I'm pretty sure that you
>could get this to work through ntdll. NtQuerySystemInformation with
>SystemProcessorInformation/SystemLogicalProcessorInformation (see
>http://undocumented.ntinternals.net/UserMode/Undocumented%20Functions/System%20Information/S
On Sunday 03 October 2010 16:22:07 Eric Pouech wrote:
> > SystemCpuInformation seems not defined anywhere outside Wine.
> > It's not defined on MSDN, neither can it be found on any Wine-unrelated
> > Documentations/Source-codes or Documentations. If you have any links or
> > documentation for Syste
On Sunday 03 October 2010 09:34:02 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
> > > Are the additions to the structures your own invention?
> >
> > Yes, as SystemClass 0x01 and struct SYSTEM_CPU_INFORMATION seem to be
> > Wine- only (I could not find anythi
On Saturday 02 October 2010 15:15:48 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
> > This is used in NTDLL and Kernel32 to provide an Implementation for
> > kernel32's GetLogicalProcessorInformation().
>
> Are the additions to the structures your own invention?
On Saturday 02 October 2010 08:15:46 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
> > /* System Information Class 0x01 */
> >
> > +typedef struct _SYSTEM_CPU_CACHE_INFORMATION {
> > +ULONG ProcessorMask;
> > +CACHE_DESCRIPTOR CacheInformation;
&g
11 matches
Mail list logo
