-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-10-03 16:05, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
I don't think this patch makes sense before you actually unify the
location management. In particular, after this patch you'd have
location management in resources that really only does anything
for
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
May fix bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34475.
Should fix bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34209, too.
-Ken
On 10/2/2013 12:58, Andrew Cook wrote:
+if(!pCreateJobObjectW) {
+win_skip(No job object support\n);
+return;
+}
Once you checked that I suppose you don't need to check for
pIsProcessInJob being null, or it still could happen?
+if (option strcmp(option, wait) ==
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2426
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2429
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2431
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2434
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2430
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2433
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2432
Your paranoid
I cannnot make sure my patch
99266 was
rejected.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Akira Nakagawa matyapir...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannnot make sure my patch 99266 was rejected.
I can't really tell why it was rejected but I can tell there are mixed
space/tabs in the SetLastError lines.
I guess if you SetLastError to not implemented you cannot
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:26:51PM -0300, Bruno Jesus wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Akira Nakagawa matyapir...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannnot make sure my patch 99266 was rejected.
I can't really tell why it was rejected but I can tell there are mixed
space/tabs in the SetLastError
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2457
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2455
Your paranoid
I guess if you SetLastError to not implemented you cannot return S_OK too
It doesn't make sense to use SetLastError at all for functions
returning HRESULT.
Akihiro Sagawa sagawa@gmail.com writes:
---
dlls/gdi32/freetype.c | 12
dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c |5 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
It looks like something is not quite right, this is causing strange
spacing, for instance in the About dialog.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2605
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2607
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2608
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2609
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2610
Your paranoid
Hi,
I have a need for a new icon in Wine and I'm hoping somebody with some
graphics-design skills might be able to create it.
The Mac driver attempts to extract an icon from the executable to use for the
Dock icon of its process. This is also the icon that appears in the
Command-Tab
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru wrote:
diff --git a/server/file.c b/server/file.c
index 2ecf97c..94d3060 100644
--- a/server/file.c
+++ b/server/file.c
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static mode_t file_access_to_mode( unsigned int access )
access = generic_file_map_access( access );
if
Ignore this, for some reason this randomly forks a huge number of rpcss
instances, and decided to not do so while i was testing it
On 03/10/13 14:00, Andrew Cook wrote:
---
dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_epmap.c | 40 ---
programs/rpcss/Makefile.in | 2 +-
programs/rpcss/rpcss_main.c
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2414
Your paranoid
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru writes:
Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
I don't see the point. Do you actually have an app that depends on this?
When I started to work on this I had an app that has one of the reasons to
require running under Vista+ was the difference in
Hi,
Corrected warnings.
Changelog: Implement IDataSourceLocator get/put hWnd
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
From 13b8466033f24db028bfed6de609c4cd5f84b14a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alist...@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:05:01 +1000
Subject:
Hi,
Changelog:
mscoree: Implement CreateInterface
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
From 6e4b9aff1f2a8776be0ad3cf6e9d0404dd5bec29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alist...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:17:50 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Implement
Ralf Habacker ralf.habac...@freenet.de writes:
With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in the top
level function it looks like having driver specific stuff using display
coordinates.
It would still
Hans Leidekker h...@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -129,11 +129,19 @@ static const RTL_OSVERSIONINFOEXW
VersionData[NB_WINDOWS_VERSIONS] =
4, 0, 0, VER_NT_WORKSTATION, 30 /* FIXME: Great, a reserved field
with a value! */
},
/* WINXP */
+#ifdef _WIN64
+{
+
Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
I don't see the point. Do you actually have an app that depends on this?
When I started to work on this I had an app that has one of the reasons to
require running under Vista+ was the difference in overlapped IO behavior.
On the other hand
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru writes:
Do you propose to leave NtWriteFile/NtReadFile in the state when they
return STATUS_SUCCESS for overlapped writes and reads? But that's clearly
not how Windows implements this accordingto the tests, and that would
require changing all the tests to
Ralf Habacker r...@habacker.de writes:
On 01.10.2013 12:12, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ralf Habacker ralf.habac...@freenet.de writes:
With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in the top
level function
Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Do you propose to leave NtWriteFile/NtReadFile in the state when they
return STATUS_SUCCESS for overlapped writes and reads? But that's clearly
not how Windows implements this accordingto the tests, and that would
require changing all the
Please split this.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Hans Leidekker h...@codeweavers.com wrote:
---
dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 9 +
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
index c34de4b..6855298
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 09:32 -0300, Bruno Jesus wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Hans Leidekker h...@codeweavers.com wrote:
---
dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 9 +
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2419
Your paranoid
Seems reasonable, but could you put together some tests to show this?
Andrew
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
diff --git a/dlls/dsound/capture.c b/dlls/dsound/capture.c
index 40f1702..0fe300c 100644
--- a/dlls/dsound/capture.c
+++ b/dlls/dsound/capture.c
@@
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2420
Your paranoid
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Francois Gouget wrote:
[...]
The timeout was too short and would only work for UARTs that have a
FIFO and where the trigger level was set just right. With this patch
we calculate how much time sending the test data will actually take
and tack on a small margin to take
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2421
Your paranoid
Akihiro Sagawa sagawa@gmail.com writes:
Try 2:
- Get rid of redundant trace message in the last patch.
---
dlls/gdi32/freetype.c |2 +-
dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c |8 +++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This is causing failures here:
Any reason not to share code with CLRCreateInstance?
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ HIMC WINAPI ImmCreateContext(void)
gl-dwSize = sizeof(GUIDELINE);
ImmUnlockIMCC(new_context-IMC.hGuideLine);
+memset(new_context-IMC.cfCandForm, -1,
sizeof(new_context-IMC.cfCandForm));
+
That's ugly. If you
Ok, fixed and resent
-aric
On 10/1/13 2:13 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ HIMC WINAPI ImmCreateContext(void)
gl-dwSize = sizeof(GUIDELINE);
ImmUnlockIMCC(new_context-IMC.hGuideLine);
+
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2427
Your paranoid
On 01.10.2013 12:12, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ralf Habacker ralf.habac...@freenet.de writes:
With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in the top
level function it looks like having driver specific
On 01.10.2013 12:40, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ralf Habacker r...@habacker.de writes:
On 01.10.2013 12:12, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ralf Habacker ralf.habac...@freenet.de writes:
With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
driver. Unfortunally this do not works
Am 29.09.2013 20:08, schrieb André Hentschel:
Am 28.09.2013 21:51, schrieb Bernard Ladenthin:
---
dlls/kernel32/time.c | 149
++
1 file changed, 149 insertions(+)
Hi,
please don't use C++ comments, also the rest of the coding style isn't
2013/9/30 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com
On 9/30/2013 00:51, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
+struct progress_list {
+const DWORD progress_retval_init; /* value to return from progress
routine */
+const BOOL cancel_init;/* value to set Cancel flag to */
+const DWORD
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2403
Your paranoid
Bruno Jesus 00cp...@gmail.com writes:
@@ -2427,6 +2427,46 @@ static void WINAPI WS2_GetAcceptExSockaddrs(PVOID
buffer, DWORD data_size, DWORD
}
/***
+ * WSASendMsg
+ */
+int WINAPI WSASendMsg( SOCKET s, LPWSAMSG
Huw Davies h...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
dlls/setupapi/fakedll.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I don't think that's correct. The datadir is for platform-independent
files, but the fakedlls are platform specific.
--
Alexandre Julliard
2013/9/4 Zhenbo Li litime...@gmail.com:
This patch could fix bug 34431, which is caused by missing atl90.dll
---
configure | 1 +
configure.ac | 1 +
dlls/atl90/Makefile.in | 7
dlls/atl90/atl90.c | 93
++
I need to increase the $max_req_size in tools/make_requests. A new request
structure for GetConsoleScreenBufferInfoEx is 80 bytes and primarily made up of
16 unsigned long integers. This is fine, but raises the error:
wineserver: request.c:755: open_master_socket: Assertion `sizeof(union
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Daniel Jeliński djelins...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/9/30 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com
On 9/30/2013 00:51, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
+struct progress_list {
+const DWORD progress_retval_init; /* value to return from progress
routine */
+const
On 9/30/2013 10:10, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
2013/9/30 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com
mailto:bungleh...@gmail.com
On 9/30/2013 00:51, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
+struct progress_list {
+const DWORD progress_retval_init; /* value to return
from progress routine
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Bruno Jesus 00cp...@gmail.com writes:
@@ -2427,6 +2427,46 @@ static void WINAPI WS2_GetAcceptExSockaddrs(PVOID
buffer, DWORD data_size, DWORD
}
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru writes:
---
dlls/ntdll/file.c | 3 ++-
dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I don't see the point. Do you actually have an app that depends on this?
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On 01.10.2013 00:06, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
---
dlls/wldap32/init.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/wldap32/init.c b/dlls/wldap32/init.c
index b5aed58..54b5b24 100644
--- a/dlls/wldap32/init.c
+++ b/dlls/wldap32/init.c
@@ -113,13 +113,13 @@ oom:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Akihiro Sagawa sagawa@gmail.com wrote:
Fixes bug 18440, 20847.
Try 3:
- Rebase to recent source.
- Separate ABC metrics change.
- Use conditional operator.
---
dlls/gdi32/freetype.c |4 ++--
dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c | 24
Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
I don't see the point. Do you actually have an app that depends on this?
When I started to work on this I had an app that has one of the reasons to
require running under Vista+ was the difference in overlapped IO behavior.
On the other hand the
Solved. server/protocol.def is the correct place to adjust the request_max_size
value.
On 9/30/2013 00:51, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
+struct progress_list {
+const DWORD progress_retval_init; /* value to return from progress
routine */
+const BOOL cancel_init;/* value to set Cancel flag to */
+const DWORD progress_retval_end; /* value to return from
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2387
Your paranoid
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:58:33AM +0900, Akira Nakagawa wrote:
From 2ecc71fdb3406d3cf79ebcbd7f6d0c711b68d699 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
2ecc71fdb3406d3cf79ebcbd7f6d0c711b68d699.1379923234.git.matyapir...@gmail.com
From: Akira Nakagawa matyapir...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Sep
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2388
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2391
Your paranoid
On 28 September 2013 09:35, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de wrote:
rest looks ok, but you really only should submit:
I don't think it does, it still has e.g. the modified copyright
headers I pointed out when this was still at try 1.
Hi André,
This patch seem let some urls in non-english version broken.
Such as some urls in this page in Chinese:
http://www.winehq.org/site/forums
-[a href=http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-announce
（取消）订阅/a]
-[a href=http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-announce/;存档 1/a]
+
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2392
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2393
Your paranoid
I still don't understand why the copyright is different for the .c and
.h file. In one file you add your first name only and in the other
your full name.
Regards,
Bruno
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Akira Nakagawa matyapir...@gmail.com wrote:
--
universe* god::bigbang (void); //and
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2351
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2356
Your paranoid
Hi all,
I see this patch is in 'pending' now, are there anything needs to be
improved?
Please give me some advice.
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Jactry Zeng
George Stephanos gaf.stepha...@gmail.com writes:
@@ -224,13 +248,138 @@ static NTSTATUS open_key( HKEY *retkey, ACCESS_MASK
access, OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES *a
}
+static LSTATUS create_hkcr_struct( HKEY *hkey, opened_hkcr_t **hkcr )
+{
+UINT_PTR handle = nb_hkcr_handles, i;
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-27 00:15, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
-swapchain-swapchain_ops-swapchain_present(swapchain,
src_rect, dst_rect, dirty_region, flags); +
wined3d_cs_emit_present(swapchain-device-cs, swapchain,
src_rect, +dst_rect,
On 27 September 2013 13:05, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesin...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should place comments like This function is called through
the command stream for all functions that are called through the CS,
similar to what we do for context activation.
Perhaps, I'm not sure. For that
Akihiro Sagawa sagawa@gmail.com writes:
Fixes bug 18440, 20847.
Try 3:
- Rebase to recent source.
- Separate ABC metrics change.
- Use conditional operator.
It breaks the tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so
dib.c touch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-27 14:19, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
Perhaps, I'm not sure. For that kind of comment to be useful it
should have a clear set of implications, and I'm not sure it has
that until we work out the details of the multi-threaded
implementation.
On 27 September 2013 15:23, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesin...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-27 14:19, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
Perhaps, I'm not sure. For that kind of comment to be useful it
should have a clear set of implications, and I'm not sure it
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2370
Your paranoid
Isn't this going to make the caption Wine Gecko Installer in both cases?
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2374
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2375
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2376
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2377
Your paranoid
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Bruno Jesus 00cp...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixes bug 34005.
There is a problem with this patch, I'm working on an updated version.
Sorry,
Bruno
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2386
Your paranoid
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
Obviously you need nothing to know about the test except that it works with
a COM-port, so the only thing you'd need to investigate is the difference
between VMs in COM-port setup,
There's none. All the VMs, wxppro, w7u, w7pro64, etc have the
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2338
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2339
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2341
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2343
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2344
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2345
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2340
Your paranoid
101 - 200 of 74996 matches
Mail list logo
