On Tuesday 13 February 2007 14:38, Aric Stewart wrote:
> finds the case where the scrolling amount exceeds the window but still
> falls within the clipping rect. This generates an additional update
> region that needs to be invalidated.
> includes a test
>
Hi,
I think your patch has a problem.
I
I think you misunderstand. I wrote extensive tests _on windows_ that I
used for this patch which where independent on the existing test in wine
as i could not get the wine test to work properly in window, most
likely, do to a lack of understand on the testing framework.
After i made the patch
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, apparently the fix was based on a test (that was supposed to mimic
> a real application behaviour that exposed a bug), and since the test is
> wrong (since it doesn't pass on a single flavour of Windows) the fix is
> wrong as well.
The test f
"Aric Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did my work comparing to windows 2000. I could not get the test to
run at all on my windows box so i had to try to fiddle with the test to
get it to work.
What exactly was the problem?
I spent a lot of time working on windows 2000 to make
this be
I did my work comparing to windows 2000. I could not get the test to
run at all on my windows box so i had to try to fiddle with the test to
get it to work. I spent a lot of time working on windows 2000 to make
this behavior the same and so feel the patch is not "obviously
incorrect" and mos
"Aric Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+SetRect( &rc, 0,40, 100,60);
+SetRect( &cliprc, 0,0, 100,100);
+ScrollWindowEx( hwnd1, 0, -25, &rc, &cliprc, hrgn, &rcu, SW_INVALIDATE);
+SetRectRgn( tmprgn, 0,15,98,35);
+CombineRgn( exprgn, exprgn, tmprgn, RGN_OR);
+SetRectRgn(
