On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 07:38, Daniel Jelinski wrote:
> Hello,
> ...
> Bug 19222 makes using MS SQL Server management studio a pain. The
> application displays database structure in a tree view, and most
> actions are executed from a context menu displayed by right-clicking
> on a relevant positio
Hello,
I see that my patch hasn't been accepted yet. Well if some explanation
could help it through, here goes:
Bug 19222 makes using MS SQL Server management studio a pain. The
application displays database structure in a tree view, and most
actions are executed from a context menu displayed by ri
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17772
Your paranoid android
Dnia 09-04-2012 o 04:13:44 Vitaliy Margolen
napisał(a):
On 04/08/2012 01:44 PM, Daniel Jelinski wrote:
Hardware messages are an alternative, but I couldn't find any relevant
examples, so I followed the path of least resistance.
These tests you wrote won't work. Emulating mouse up/down events w
On 04/08/2012 01:44 PM, Daniel Jelinski wrote:
Hardware messages are an alternative, but I couldn't find any relevant
examples, so I followed the path of least resistance.
These tests you wrote won't work. Emulating mouse up/down events with
anything other then hardware messages will not exercis
2012/4/8 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Daniel Jelinski wrote:
>
>> Skipping tests on WinNT - older versions of comctl send a different
>> set of events.
>
> Then you need to figure out what is different, and make the tests pass
> there as well (there is 'optional' flag for that), otherwise you risk
> break
Daniel Jelinski wrote:
> Skipping tests on WinNT - older versions of comctl send a different
> set of events.
Then you need to figure out what is different, and make the tests pass
there as well (there is 'optional' flag for that), otherwise you risk
breaking applications written for NT.
> +
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17721
Your paranoid android
