>> Well, in 2010 I've only done little changes. The real development on
>> this was in 2009. What's the policy in these cases? I believe I can
>> put the 2010 safely.
>I have seen people adjust the years for simple fixes, although I don't know if
>there is a formal
>policy. Since your patches are
Am 08.02.2010 um 21:51 schrieb Matteo Bruni:
> In this case the '{' should go on its own line, sure. In general in
> shader.c I tried to keep the style already used there, while in the
> shader assembler files the style is different (although it should be
> consistent on itself).
> Let me know if
2010/2/8 Stefan Dösinger :
>
> Am 08.02.2010 um 16:33 schrieb Matteo Bruni:
>
>> Other than the things Henri last mentioned, there are some more small
>> changes (make some struct const/static, whitespace fixes, remove some
>> useless cruft, ...) particularly in patches 2 and 3.
>> <0001-d3dx9-Part
Am 08.02.2010 um 16:33 schrieb Matteo Bruni:
> Other than the things Henri last mentioned, there are some more small
> changes (make some struct const/static, whitespace fixes, remove some
> useless cruft, ...) particularly in patches 2 and 3.
> <0001-d3dx9-Partial-implementation-of-D3DXAssembleS
