Henri Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
diff --git a/dlls/secur32/Makefile.in b/dlls/secur32/Makefile.in
index df9695a..9805d92 100644
--- a/dlls/secur32/Makefile.in
+++ b/dlls/secur32/Makefile.in
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ MODULE= secur32.dll
IMPORTLIB = secur32
IMPORTS = netapi32 advapi32
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Henri Verbeet wrote:
From cb10664e7d7526951d97f6d9ba2f7429d20b69d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henri Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 22:39:11 +0200
Subject: secur32: Require gnutls for schannel
+AC_ARG_WITH(gnutls,
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Meissner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Henri Verbeet wrote:
From cb10664e7d7526951d97f6d9ba2f7429d20b69d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henri Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 22:39:11 +0200
Subject:
2008/9/8 Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmm,
I really do not think gnutls will have a long feature,
NSS seems to be the future choice of crypto frameworks :/
Ciao, Marcus
I did have a look at NSS, but didn't see a way to make it work with a
simple buffer, which makes in impractical to
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:36:36PM -0700, Lei Zhang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Meissner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Henri Verbeet wrote:
From cb10664e7d7526951d97f6d9ba2f7429d20b69d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henri Verbeet
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:37:39PM +0200, Henri Verbeet wrote:
2008/9/8 Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmm,
I really do not think gnutls will have a long feature,
NSS seems to be the future choice of crypto frameworks :/
Ciao, Marcus
I did have a look at NSS, but didn't see a
If its easier with gnutls, please use it.
+1
I also agree that nss is likely to replace openssl as the toolkit
of choice. But if depending
on gnutls is the easiest path to a working schannel, that's
the right thing to do. We can always change later if a
compelling reason arises.
- Dan
