On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:58:00 +
Ricardo Filipe wrote:
> bug links are manually recoverable, searching bugzilla and linking should be
> easy, i can do that if you feel you don't have time to.
You can find a copy of wine appdb here http://ftp.winehq.org/pub/wine/
So someone may have a old copy
Ricardo Filipe gmail.com> writes:
> as i said before, it was an uninformed decision, and yes, not enough time was
>left for feedback from the maintainers.we thought that appdb WOULD save all the
>data when moving, not only tests. it serves as example for us for the future,
>unfortunatly with prob
as i said before, it was an uninformed decision, and yes, not enough time
was left for feedback from the maintainers.
we thought that appdb WOULD save all the data when moving, not only tests.
it serves as example for us for the future, unfortunatly with problems to
the EQ2 users. as i said before,
Ben Klein gmail.com> writes:
>
> I just noticed that the entry for "Everquest II", the sequel to
> "Everquest", is listed as version 2 under "Everquest" in AppDB. This
> is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
> it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd del
agreed. either that or do a new link that copies EVERYTHING.
i've CCed the appdb site manager to see what he thinks :)
2009/3/15 Rosanne DiMesio
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:23:20 +
> Ricardo Filipe wrote:
>
> > no test data was lost. it is all in the new link.
> >
> > i already stated the com
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:23:20 +
Ricardo Filipe wrote:
> no test data was lost. it is all in the new link.
>
> i already stated the comments got lost and i'm sorry for that, i thought
> appdb would copy them too.
> and that's why i asked for the EQ maintainers to step up to be EQ2
> maintainer
2009/3/16 Ricardo Filipe :
> actually ben, how to's and warnings also went away.
> i think beaulieu already found them elsewhere and updated the page with
> them, thanks ;)
>
> sorry about that again, i'll post a bug for moving data to also copy the
> rest of the page...
Oh well, I still appreciat
actually ben, how to's and warnings also went away.
i think beaulieu already found them elsewhere and updated the page with
them, thanks ;)
sorry about that again, i'll post a bug for moving data to also copy the
rest of the page...
2009/3/15 Ben Klein
> 2009/3/16 Ricardo Filipe :
> > no test d
no test data was lost. it is all in the new link.
i already stated the comments got lost and i'm sorry for that, i thought
appdb would copy them too.
and that's why i asked for the EQ maintainers to step up to be EQ2
maintainers. i apologize for the missing comments, again.
2009/3/15 John Beaulie
all that is changed it was me. i kept everything on context, although i
forgot to copy EQ2 description :S
what i meant is that you or other EQ maintainer ask to be EQ2 maintainer ;)
2009/3/15 Charity Abbott
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Ricardo Filipe
> wrote:
> > done. i've created a new
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Ricardo Filipe
wrote:
> done. i've created a new application and moved test data there. unfortunatly
> appdb doesn't move comments so those are lost :(
>
> i wait for the EQ maintainers to step up for EQ2 :P
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=applic
done. i've created a new application and moved test data there. unfortunatly
appdb doesn't move comments so those are lost :(
i wait for the EQ maintainers to step up for EQ2 :P
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=9400
2009/3/15 Ben Klein
> I just noticed that the e
not really... it's a completly new game. i'll see if i can do something...
2009/3/15 John Beaulieu
> This is really nitpicking isn't it?
>
> On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 12:02 +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
> > I just noticed that the entry for "Everquest II", the sequel to
> > "Everquest", is listed as versi
This is really nitpicking isn't it?
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 12:02 +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
> I just noticed that the entry for "Everquest II", the sequel to
> "Everquest", is listed as version 2 under "Everquest" in AppDB. This
> is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
I just noticed that the entry for "Everquest II", the sequel to
"Everquest", is listed as version 2 under "Everquest" in AppDB. This
is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd delete the version
but there's quite a bit of
15 matches
Mail list logo
