Re: [PATCH] Add some more schannel tests

2010-09-07 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5095 Your paranoid android.

Re: [PATCH] Add some more schannel tests

2010-09-07 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5092 Your paranoid android.

Re: [PATCH] Add some more schannel tests

2010-09-07 Thread Mikko Rasa
On 07.09.2010 22:37, Hans Leidekker wrote: @@ -116,6 +128,10 @@ static void InitFunctionPtrs(void) if(!secdll) secdll = LoadLibraryA("security.dll"); advapi32dll = GetModuleHandleA("advapi32.dll"); +wsockdll = LoadLibraryA("ws2_32.dll"); + +if(!wsockdll) +

Re: [PATCH] Add some more schannel tests

2010-09-07 Thread Hans Leidekker
> @@ -116,6 +128,10 @@ static void InitFunctionPtrs(void) > if(!secdll) > secdll = LoadLibraryA("security.dll"); > advapi32dll = GetModuleHandleA("advapi32.dll"); > +wsockdll = LoadLibraryA("ws2_32.dll"); > + > +if(!wsockdll) > + printf("Couldn't open ws2_32.d