On 03/06/2011 02:45 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
What's a point to make such changes in a first place? I don't see how
it's useful to have automatically extracted partially filled function
names from sources (if it's a purpose of these documentation headers of
course). You always have sources,
Hi Max,
+ *
http://www.geoffchappell.com/studies/windows/win32/ntdll/history/names40.htm
Please don't link to his site. As I said in an unrelated message to
wine-patches last week, he used disassembly when performing his
analysis:
http://www.geoffchappell.com/viewer.htm?doc=notes/index.htm
I
On 03/06/2011 10:34 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
Hi Max,
+ *
http://www.geoffchappell.com/studies/windows/win32/ntdll/history/names40.htm
Please don't link to his site. As I said in an unrelated message to
wine-patches last week, he used disassembly when performing his
analysis:
On 3/6/2011 22:34, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
On 03/06/2011 10:34 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
Hi Max,
+ *
http://www.geoffchappell.com/studies/windows/win32/ntdll/history/names40.htm
Please don't link to his site. As I said in an unrelated message to
wine-patches last week, he used disassembly
