On 04/01/2013 08:16 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
I think it's ok for the tests to be todo_wine, but we do want ddraw
coverage for this in the tests.
Fine by me. But that will take a few days since I'll have to familiarize
myself with ddraw first. :)
In the meantime, should I resend this patchset
On 1 April 2013 16:56, Sam Edwards wrote:
> In the meantime, should I resend this patchset (with the reset_device()
> change included) so that it can be reviewed and committed while I'm busy
> with ddraw (and send the ddraw tests in a separate patch), or is this
> patchset unacceptable until I inc
On 1 April 2013 02:40, Sam Edwards wrote:
> I opted not to write ddraw tests. The existing ddraw window style tests
> suggest that DirectDraw doesn't even set WS_VISIBLE when initializing a
> (non-visible) window, which is very odd, so any new tests would have been
> todo_wine anyway. Nonetheless,
