On 2005-09-14, Robert Shearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-09-10, JustFillBug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw the bug described in:
http://winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2001/01/0516.html
happened again to a program I was trying to use. At least the behavior
is the same. I have no access to
On 2005-09-10, JustFillBug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw the bug described in:
http://winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2001/01/0516.html
happened again to a program I was trying to use. At least the behavior
is the same. I have no access to the source code. It seems the problem
was fixed in
JustFillBug wrote:
On 2005-09-10, JustFillBug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw the bug described in:
http://winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2001/01/0516.html
happened again to a program I was trying to use. At least the behavior
is the same. I have no access to the source code. It seems the
On 2005-09-14, Robert Shearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this patch fix it?
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c,v
retrieving revision 1.189
diff -u -p -r1.189 socket.c
--- dlls/winsock/socket.c 27 Aug 2005 09:20:24 - 1.189
+++ dlls/winsock/socket.c 14
