On Tuesday 29 September 2009 10:57:45 you wrote:
> You should use SendMessageA instead of SendMessageW to make the test run
> under Win9x as well. Testing the return value of SendMessage would be also
> helpful.
Hi,
The TRY 5 of tests had beent sent. Is it correct or my test so bad that nobody
"Dmitry Timoshkov" writes:
> "Ilya Shpigor" wrote:
>
>> The TRY 5 of tests had beent sent. Is it correct or my test so bad
>> that nobody doesn't like to answer? :)
>
> Try 5 looks good to me (therefore the lack of the comment), not sure
> why it wasn't committed.
It's still using W functions,
"Ilya Shpigor" wrote:
The TRY 5 of tests had beent sent. Is it correct or my test so bad that nobody
doesn't like to answer? :)
Try 5 looks good to me (therefore the lack of the comment), not sure
why it wasn't committed.
--
Dmitry.
"Ilya Shpigor" wrote:
+flush_sequence();
+SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_BITMAP, (LPARAM)hbm);
+todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetImageErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETIMAGE on a static",
FALSE);
+
+flush_sequence();
+SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ICON, (LPAR
