Re: [janatorial] HeapReAlloc

2003-10-08 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Jerry Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe we can add a new inline function which likes > inline void *HeapReAllocEx(..., lpMemory, ...) > { > if (lpMemory)... > else ... > } > then > #defineHeapReAllocHeapReAllocEx > in a proper header file. No, that will confuse people e

Re: [janatorial] HeapReAlloc

2003-10-08 Thread Jerry Jenkins
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Oleg Prokhorov wrote: > > > Change-log: > > fix wine code depended on > > That's cool, but we need to somehow manage this. There are almost > 300 occurences of memory reallocation, and we need to somehow > keep track of what was reviwed/fixed etc

Re[2]: [janatorial] HeapReAlloc

2003-10-08 Thread Oleg Prokhorov
Hello Dimitrie, Thursday, October 9, 2003, 12:09:31 AM, you wrote: DOP> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Oleg Prokhorov wrote: >> Change-log: >> fix wine code depended on DOP> That's cool, but we need to somehow manage this. That's a "testing" patch, if it gets committed I'll continue work on this :).

Re: [janatorial] HeapReAlloc

2003-10-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Oleg Prokhorov wrote: > Change-log: > fix wine code depended on That's cool, but we need to somehow manage this. There are almost 300 occurences of memory reallocation, and we need to somehow keep track of what was reviwed/fixed etc., otherwise we risk missing quite a few.