"Jerry Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe we can add a new inline function which likes
> inline void *HeapReAllocEx(..., lpMemory, ...)
> {
> if (lpMemory)...
> else ...
> }
> then
> #defineHeapReAllocHeapReAllocEx
> in a proper header file.
No, that will confuse people e
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Oleg Prokhorov wrote:
>
> > Change-log:
> > fix wine code depended on
>
> That's cool, but we need to somehow manage this. There are almost
> 300 occurences of memory reallocation, and we need to somehow
> keep track of what was reviwed/fixed etc
Hello Dimitrie,
Thursday, October 9, 2003, 12:09:31 AM, you wrote:
DOP> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Oleg Prokhorov wrote:
>> Change-log:
>> fix wine code depended on
DOP> That's cool, but we need to somehow manage this.
That's a "testing" patch, if it gets committed I'll continue work on
this :).
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Oleg Prokhorov wrote:
> Change-log:
> fix wine code depended on
That's cool, but we need to somehow manage this. There are almost
300 occurences of memory reallocation, and we need to somehow
keep track of what was reviwed/fixed etc., otherwise we risk
missing quite a few.