On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 03:41:35AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I think separate columns would serve us better by not
> repeating the overly long tags several times.
Separate columns are good idea if we can get them.
> > For now each submit two: one .zip, one compressed with as
> > a self-extra
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> 3. We are running multiple test _per_ build, but only
>>> one is curretly reported. Currently, it says:
>>> Main summary for build 200406171000
>>> where '200406171000' is a link to the test. But since
>>> we have multiple do
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 02:33:31AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Good catch, fixed (*)
Nice, thanks for the quick fix.
> > 2. The differences tables are inconsistent.
>
> How can you say that?! Do you think WineHQ can't reliably
> run my pro
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Speaking of the test results, I've noticed the following problems:
> 1. Some errors reported in the summary
> don't get reported in the differences.
Good catch, fixed (*)
> 2. The differences tables are inconsistent.
How can you say tha
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 07:36:52PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Not that I know of. Submitting a patch, thanks for pointing
> it out.
Speaking of the test results, I've noticed the following problems:
1. Some errors reported in the summary
don't get reported in the differences.
For
Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i noticed that not all dlls with unittests are listed
> inside the Main summary of test.winehq.org. Missing dlls
> are: iphlpapi, mapi32, msvcrtd, psapi, version
>
> Is there any reason for this?
Not that I know of. Submitting a patch, thanks for poi
Hello,
i noticed that not all dlls with unittests are listed inside the Main summary
of test.winehq.org. Missing dlls are: iphlpapi, mapi32, msvcrtd, psapi,
version
Is there any reason for this?
Bye Stefan