Now, I am writing tests for this.
Windows crashes if I pass NULL pointer to these function.
Crash can be easily avoided in wine.
Should we crash too?
And how the windows crash can be caught? Or just I should not write such
test-case?
Thanks,
--
Kirill
Hi,
I've sent the patch:
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-April/038205.html
about a week ago and it has not been applied. Please, explain, what is wrong
with it?
Thanks
--
Kirill
On 4/24/07, Kirill K. Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've sent the patch:
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-April/038205.html
about a week ago and it has not been applied. Please, explain, what is wrong
with it?
You haven't sent in any tests for this function. Is
On 4/24/07, Kirill K. Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've sent the patch:
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-April/038205.html
about a week ago and it has not been applied. Please, explain, what is
wrong with it?
You haven't sent in any tests for this function.
On 4/25/07, Kirill K. Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/07, Kirill K. Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've sent the patch:
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-April/038205.html
about a week ago and it has not been applied. Please, explain, what is
wrong
For containing backshash. Yes, comment must be better.
A comment that states you're looking for a backslash is superfluous;
the code makes that obvious. A better comment would be 'check for
filename only' or something along those lines.
Maybe, 'MSDN claims that if filename contains
