Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
It was on the italian news, it's an optical processor, so it may or may not be x86 compatible, I dont know the name of the company but I can try and find out.
- - - - -
On a guess you are talking about this (Slashdot ran the story twice)
http://slashdot.org/article
It was on the italian news, it's an optical processor, so it may or may not be x86
compatible, I dont know the name of the company but I can try and find out.
- - - - -
> Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
>
> >This depends, it can go from 15-20 minutes to over 4 hours.
> >A company in Israel has built
My suggest is not related with power. On most hardwares, the compilation
takes a lot of time. I mean increasing make nice value would make it
more user friendly. If you don't use your computer, the compilation
process will require the same time as without this tweak. If you want to
use it, you will
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
This depends, it can go from 15-20 minutes to over 4 hours.
A company in Israel has built a 8000 Ghz (Not a typo, it's Ghz) processor, that
may take it down to a few seconds.
I think you just pointed to the local technology press being negligent
to a degree never b
This depends, it can go from 15-20 minutes to over 4 hours.
A company in Israel has built a 8000 Ghz (Not a typo, it's Ghz) processor, that
may take it down to a few seconds.
Since the compilation process is very long, I suggest you give a higher
nice value to the make processes launched by wineinstall. I will allow
the user to do something else with its computer while wine is compiling.
See where you could give higher nice values in the diff file attached.
Jérôme
Ind
