On 10/12/07, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the only applications which should block Wine releases should be
> ones which are freely downloadable and for which automated tests exist
> (with cxtest, yawt or something). The rational is that everyone should
> be able to run the t
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Dan Kegel wrote:
[...]
> Do we want to add Microsoft Word 2003 to the "must have" apps list for 1.0?
> It might delay the release.
I think the only applications which should block Wine releases should be
ones which are freely downloadable and for which automated tests exist
(
On 10/8/07, Roland Kaeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app
> works on Wine?
>
There will never be a point where all Windows apps work in Wine. As
it stands, we have a bigger compatibility goal than current versions
of
007, 22:36:41 Uhr
Betreff: Re: 1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003
On 10/7/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb
I see you attached the patch to bug 9023, thanks.
> and I
> did some further testing in Office 2003
On 10/7/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb
I see you attached the patch to bug 9023, thanks.
> and I
> did some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to
> activate my copy of microsoft office 2003,
I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb and I did
some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to activate
my copy of microsoft office 2003, and both means of activating the application
are broken in wine due to bugs 9943 and 9944. Then I tried t
