Re: Another distro with 64-bit Wine by default

2010-03-06 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > On 03/05/2010 02:34 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:11:59PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > >>> It seems that another distro, SuSE 11.

Re: Another distro with 64-bit Wine by default

2010-03-05 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
On 03/05/2010 02:34 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:11:59PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: >>> It seems that another distro, SuSE 11.x, has Wine-64 compiled by default for >>> x86_64 platforms. That explains

Re: Another distro with 64-bit Wine by default

2010-03-05 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:11:59PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > > It seems that another distro, SuSE 11.x, has Wine-64 compiled by default for > > x86_64 platforms. That explains all the issues people been having on SuSE > > lat

Re: Another distro with 64-bit Wine by default

2010-03-05 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > It seems that another distro, SuSE 11.x, has Wine-64 compiled by default for > x86_64 platforms. That explains all the issues people been having on SuSE > lately. > > Marcus, could you please create a separate package wine-64 inst

Another distro with 64-bit Wine by default

2010-03-05 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
It seems that another distro, SuSE 11.x, has Wine-64 compiled by default for x86_64 platforms. That explains all the issues people been having on SuSE lately. Marcus, could you please create a separate package wine-64 instead and build 32-bit Wine by default for x86_64 arch instead? Vitaliy.