Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-24 Thread James McKenzie
Marcus Meissner wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:37:11PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote: James Mckenzie wrote: Octavian Voicu wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote: Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:37:11PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > James Mckenzie wrote: >> Octavian Voicu wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes >>> wrote: >>> Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root Paul> root 87238 Jun

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread James McKenzie
James Mckenzie wrote: Octavian Voicu wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote: Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way. What about debi

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:50 AM, James Mckenzie wrote: > Octavian Voicu wrote: >>On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes >> wrote: >>>    Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root >>>    Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h >>> >>> Ah, Readha

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread James Mckenzie
Octavian Voicu wrote: >On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes > wrote: >>    Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root >>    Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h >> >> Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way. >> What about debian? >> >> Isn't th

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread Octavian Voicu
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote: >    Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root >    Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h > > Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way. > What about debian? > > Isn't the OpenSSL documentation way th

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Paul" == Paul Vriens writes: >> Paul> And this is what my include file shows: Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way. What about debian? Isn'

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread Paul Vriens
On 07/23/2010 11:18 AM, Paul Vriens wrote: On 07/23/2010 10:53 AM, Uwe Bonnes wrote: Hello, on my Suse 11.3, /usr/include/ssl/ssl.h defines const SSL_METHOD *method; as does http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/ssl.html and so in ../dlls/winhttp/net.c and ../dlls/wininet/netconnection.c static SSL_

Re: Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread Paul Vriens
On 07/23/2010 10:53 AM, Uwe Bonnes wrote: Hello, on my Suse 11.3, /usr/include/ssl/ssl.h defines const SSL_METHOD *method; as does http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/ssl.html and so in ../dlls/winhttp/net.c and ../dlls/wininet/netconnection.c static SSL_METHOD *method; is flagges as an warning. M

Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

2010-07-23 Thread Uwe Bonnes
Hello, on my Suse 11.3, /usr/include/ssl/ssl.h defines const SSL_METHOD *method; as does http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/ssl.html and so in ../dlls/winhttp/net.c and ../dlls/wininet/netconnection.c static SSL_METHOD *method; is flagges as an warning. My patch exchanged -static SSL_METHOD *metho