On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:01:33 +0200, Molle Bestefich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
We have 554 unconfirmed bugs older than 90 days.
Most of these are likely to be obsolete.
It would be really easy to write a script to
ping the people who submitted those bugs,
and ask them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
This may help to get some fresh input on old bugs and for that it may
be of value but I think the basic attitude here is wrong.
The goal of autoresolving is to automate
exactly what QA volunteers currently do manually.
If
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:07:39AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Marcus Meissner wrote:
http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
I am not sure that I like this approach.
It might appear to our users that we do not care.
I bet we can word the message to avoid that appearance.
We could even
On 10/5/05, Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I think a bunch of volunteers has gone over most
of the issue manually now...
This lead to more instantely closed bugs ;)
So an automated approach is no longer necessary I guess.
There does seem to be a lot of progress
We have 554 unconfirmed bugs older than 90 days.
Most of these are likely to be obsolete.
It would be really easy to write a script to
ping the people who submitted those bugs,
and ask them to update the bug if it's still valid.
If there's no reply in two weeks, we could mark
the bug 'resolved
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:13:46PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
We have 554 unconfirmed bugs older than 90 days.
Most of these are likely to be obsolete.
It would be really easy to write a script to
ping the people who submitted those bugs,
and ask them to update the bug if it's still valid.
If
Dan Kegel wrote:
We have 554 unconfirmed bugs older than 90 days.
Most of these are likely to be obsolete.
It would be really easy to write a script to
ping the people who submitted those bugs,
and ask them to update the bug if it's still valid.
If there's no reply in two weeks, we could
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Dan Kegel wrote:
We have 554 unconfirmed bugs older than 90 days.
[...]
Detailed proposal, including the text of the message to be
sent, are at http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
Note that the second time you run the query you should only close
unconfirmed bugs
Joerg Mayer wrote:
We will automatically mark your bug as 'resolved' if we don't
hear from you in the next two weeks.
Add something like this:
It doesn't matter if don't find the time to verify the bug right now,
you can always reopen the bug later.
Good idea. I've updated the text at
Francois Gouget wrote:
http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
Note that the second time you run the query you should only close
unconfirmed bugs that are more than 104 days old and unchanged (this was
ambiguous in your proposal). That's because unconfirmed bugs that are
between 90 and
Marcus Meissner wrote:
http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
I am not sure that I like this approach.
It might appear to our users that we do not care.
I bet we can word the message to avoid that appearance.
We could even have the message simply say
Are you still interested in this
I agree,
ppl take the time to notify bugs and what you are basically saying is
we havenot even got around to looking at the bug you submitted, we are
hoping it may have gone away but just incase there is still a bug in our
software could you please spend some more time to look at it again ,
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Dan Kegel wrote:
We have 554 unconfirmed bugs older than 90 days.
[...]
Detailed proposal, including the text of the message to be
sent, are at http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
Note that the second time you run the query you should
In the same can we close the older bugs dated below 2003, with no activity.
Thanks and regards,
Vijay
On 10/1/05, Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Dan Kegel wrote:
We have 554 unconfirmed bugs older than 90 days.
[...]
Detailed
Vijay wrote:
http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
In the same can we close the older bugs
dated below 2003, with no activity.
If they're unconfirmed, my proposal will take
care of them.
And there are only 24 'new' or 'assigned'
bugs which haven't been changed in two years,
so we can
15 matches
Mail list logo
