Re: Default setting for RelayExclude

2005-05-31 Thread Mike Hearn
On Tue, 31 May 2005 15:08:37 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > I'm not really opposed to the idea, but your suggested defaults are > not really a good choice IMHO. Which ones would you choose? The ones in the list were based on filtering out "known bad" calls from a sample relay trace until I fel

Re: Default setting for RelayExclude

2005-05-31 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 26 May 2005 01:15:45 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > > Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Default setting for RelayExclude > > Alexandre, any reason this didn't get in? I'm not really opposed to the idea, b

Re: Default setting for RelayExclude

2005-05-29 Thread Mike Hearn
On Thu, 26 May 2005 01:15:45 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Default setting for RelayExclude Alexandre, any reason this didn't get in? thanks -mike