On October 9, 2003 03:02 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Bill Medland wrote:
> > Having just fallen over this might I suggest that the configure check
> > also checks for lynx; if lynx is not installed then even though
> > docbook2txt is present it fails.
> >
> > Or is there a ver
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Bill Medland wrote:
> Having just fallen over this might I suggest that the configure check also
> checks for lynx; if lynx is not installed then even though docbook2txt is
> present it fails.
>
> Or is there a version of docbook2txt that doesn't depend upon lynx?
I have no
On October 8, 2003 12:16 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Actually it seems there is now (finally) a docbook2txt tool, we should
> > probably use that instead.
>
> Indeed.
>
> ChangeLog
> Dimitrie O. Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Use docbook2txt t
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
[...]
> Index: documentation/Makefile.in
> ===
[...]
> -doc: html pdf ps
> +doc: html pdf ps txt
> html: $(ALLBOOKS:%=%.html) wine-faq.html
> pdf: $(ALLBOOKS:%=%.pdf)
> ps: $(ALLBOOKS:%=%.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Actually it seems there is now (finally) a docbook2txt tool, we should
> probably use that instead.
Indeed.
ChangeLog
Dimitrie O. Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use docbook2txt to generate the text output instead of adhoc hacks.
Index: configur
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, I didn't know about w3m either. Wouldn't a configure check be
> better here?
Actually it seems there is now (finally) a docbook2txt tool, we should
probably use that instead.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Francois Gouget wrote:
>
> I did not know about w3m before I saw this patch. More well-known and
> widely spread alternatives are lynx and links which are command-line
> compatible with w3m. So I propose to also look for them.
Yeah, I didn't know about w3m either. Wouldn't a
