Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
Hi, I am cleaning up msxml*.idl files. It seems that msxml.idl and msxml2.idl are incompatible. msxml.idl includes xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl (eg: include xmldso.idl) where as msxml2.idl explicitly declares the interface defined by xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl. This is done so that we there would be

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:53:20PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: I am cleaning up msxml*.idl files. It seems that msxml.idl and msxml2.idl are incompatible. msxml.idl includes xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl (eg: include xmldso.idl) where as msxml2.idl explicitly declares the interface defined by

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the expansion of interfaces defined in the foo.idl if we include it in foobar.idl eg: foobar.idl #include foo.idl For further reference see the msxml.idl in the PSDK headers. it includes xmldom.idl and xmldso.idl, but in the msxml.h

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the expansion of interfaces defined in the foo.idl if we include it in foobar.idl eg: foobar.idl #include foo.idl For further reference see the msxml.idl in the

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
It would be gr8 if you could check with MIDL and WIDL the output of msxml.idl On 8/29/06, Dan Hipschman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the expansion of interfaces