Hello!
> Oh yes, as newest GenuineCheck.exe crashes, newest
> WGAPluginInstall.exe may fail also. For this
> reason I've put online older versions of both: [2]
>
>
> [1]
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7b9ba261-7a9c-43e7-9117-f673077ffb3c&DisplayLang=en
> [2] http:
On 6/9/06, Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, Dan, would you be so kind as to check Firefox for
ablility to validate Wine installation as Genuine Windows?
Still fails with wine-0.9.15:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop$ ~/wine/wine WGAPluginInstall.exe
fixme:advapi:DecryptFileA "C:\\w
* On Wed, 3 May 2006, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Windows Firefox just happily updated itself under Wine to
> 1.5.0.3. Nice that an uncommon code path worked fine.
And how it does with 1.5.0.4 update?
> Firefox is solid for my uses lately.
BTW, Dan, would you be so kind as to check Firefox for
ablili
On 5/3/06, Segin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Firefox in Wine is faster than IE on Windows.
Depends on the benchmark, I think. I'm using
"Time to first download and render
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/thread.html "
and Firefox on Wine does much worse on this than Firef
On 5/3/06, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its more of feature bloatedness and codesize vs small (but full necessary)
featureset and clean programming ;)
Yeah, maybe. I can't really compare. I have passing familiarty with
Gecko and they're cleaning it up a lot, but it's still very ve
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:05:59PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On 5/3/06, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Number of konqueror affecting security problems in the last 2 years
> >(by CVE entry): ca 10.
> >Number of firefox security problems in the last 2 years
> >(by CVE entry): ca 100.
On 5/3/06, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Number of konqueror affecting security problems in the last 2 years
(by CVE entry): ca 10.
Number of firefox security problems in the last 2 years
(by CVE entry): ca 100.
(Just go to http://cve.mitre.org/cve/ and look for yourself.)
I wonde
Dimi Paun wrote:
On Wed, May 3, 2006 12:00 pm, Dan Kegel said:
Windows Firefox just happily updated itself under Wine to
1.5.0.3. Nice that an uncommon code path worked fine.
Indeed. Funny you mention it, it just updated here too.
It worked fine on Windows as well :)))
Firefox is solid f
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:42:56PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Wed, 03 May 2006 14:37:55 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote:
> > It may be, I haven't used Konqy in many years (5+).
> > Nonetheless, FF is the main non-IE browser, I'm happy
> > is now fast for doing this, it's sad it took so long
> > to get th
On Wed, 03 May 2006 14:37:55 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote:
> It may be, I haven't used Konqy in many years (5+).
> Nonetheless, FF is the main non-IE browser, I'm happy
> is now fast for doing this, it's sad it took so long
> to get there.
True, but on the other hand the engineering required to make thi
On Wed, May 3, 2006 2:30 pm, Neil Skrypuch said:
> Including Konqueror? On my machine at least, the initial render in
> Konqueror is quite a bit faster than Firefox 1.5. Cached pages are
> both pretty much instantaneous.
It may be, I haven't used Konqy in many years (5+).
Nonetheless, FF is the m
On Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:23, Dimi Paun wrote:
> > Firefox is solid for my uses lately. Performance could
> > use some work (reading the wine-devel archive index
> > gets annoying towards the end of the month when it's
> > long, as firefox takes a long time to fetch it (?)).
>
> Hm, AFAIK 1.5
On 5/3/06, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's when the cache is stale and new data is downloading
> that it's particularly painful. This is often.
But is it any faster on Windows in such cases?
Yes, I think it's about 2x or 3x faster. It certainly is on Linux
(without wine).
- Dan
On Wed, May 3, 2006 12:45 pm, Dan Kegel said:
> It's when the cache is stale and new data is downloading
> that it's particularly painful. This is often.
But is it any faster on Windows in such cases?
--
Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lattica, Inc.
On 5/3/06, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firefox is solid for my uses lately. Performance could
> use some work (reading the wine-devel archive index
> gets annoying towards the end of the month when it's
> long, as firefox takes a long time to fetch it (?)).
Hm, AFAIK 1.5 should cache
On Wed, May 3, 2006 12:00 pm, Dan Kegel said:
> Windows Firefox just happily updated itself under Wine to
> 1.5.0.3. Nice that an uncommon code path worked fine.
Indeed. Funny you mention it, it just updated here too.
It worked fine on Windows as well :)))
> Firefox is solid for my uses lately.
Windows Firefox just happily updated itself under Wine to
1.5.0.3. Nice that an uncommon code path worked fine.
Firefox is solid for my uses lately. Performance could
use some work (reading the wine-devel archive index
gets annoying towards the end of the month when it's
long, as firefox takes
17 matches
Mail list logo
