Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Hallo,
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so
metafile.c
failes like:
metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)-(10,10), expected (0,0)-(18,67)
metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)-(10,10), expected (0,0)-(18,67)
Some discussion on
Robert Shearman wrote:
I wrote the test, but I'm beginning to wish I hadn't. The failures are
either one of two things: differences in when the transforms are updated
in Win9x mode or possibly because it is too sensitive to the DPI of the
screen.
It's definitly not caused by differing DPIs
Hallo,
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so
metafile.c
failes like:
metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)-(10,10), expected (0,0)-(18,67)
metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)-(10,10), expected (0,0)-(18,67)
Some discussion on #winehackers brought up some
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so
metafile.c
failes like:
metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)-(10,10), expected (0,0)-(18,67)
metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)-(10,10), expected (0,0)-(18,67)
Some discussion on #winehackers
