Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-08 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's what I get when I run 'make test' on Wine: [skipped] metafile.c:91: Test failed: pass 0: dx[42] (1081735508) didn't match 4 make[3]: *** [metafile.ok] Error 43 Is the metafile test supposed to be broken like this under Wine? That's because you

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-08 Thread Dan Kegel
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: metafile.c:91: Test failed: pass 0: dx[42] (1081735508) didn't match 4 make[3]: *** [metafile.ok] Error 43 Is the metafile test supposed to be broken like this under Wine? That's because you have no truetype fonts installed. X11 fonts are broken in that respect. Thanks for

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-04 Thread Jakob Eriksson
If you run stuff from this shell, it should run without a GUI... or something. Could come in handy for debugging of winetest.exe Haven't tested it yet, but have a go: http://p-nand-q.com/download/supershell.html

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-03 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a service process running on an invisible desktop. Winetest itself can happily run on the real visible desktop, it's just people seldom run it that way (ie. directly).

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-03 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a service process running on an invisible desktop. Winetest itself can happily run on the real visible desktop, it's just

Re: Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-03 Thread Chris Morgan
Is that a service option or what? I don't really know anything about Windows services. If you can fix this issue in winrash please do so. I've tried enabling this option and then popping up a dialog box and no dialog was displayed. It should be an easy change to re-enable this option.

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-03 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Chris Morgan wrote: I've tried enabling this option and then popping up a dialog box and no dialog was displayed. It should be an easy change to re-enable this option. I'll try it tonight. What should I look for to see if this metafile test runs correctly? metafile.c:182: Test failed:

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-02 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems the test fails in non-interactive mode without this patch. No, the problem seems to be related to a window's visibility. Windows does not play EMF records if the DC was created for a not visible window. A lot of other tests fail due to exactly that

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-02 Thread Juan Lang
Dmitry wrote: The question is what makes the tests create invisible windows? Does winetest run as a service on a not visible desktop? Anything else? I believe this is the reason. The shellpath tests fail on WinXP, I believe because HKCU doesn't exist because the service doesn't interact with

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-02 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The question is what makes the tests create invisible windows? Does winetest run as a service on a not visible desktop? Anything else? Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a service process running on an invisible desktop.

Re: Fix for metafile test

2004-11-02 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a service process running on an invisible desktop. Winetest itself can happily run on the real visible desktop, it's just people seldom run it that way (ie. directly). Then we need either