I don't want to spoil your enthusiasm but how does that differ from for
example
(old one though) http://test.winehq.org/data/200801301937/#Wine ?
The main difference is that I ran it from my Wine tree, and getting it built
and ready to go was completely under my control. That is, this is as
Jeremy White wrote:
I believe that we have an easy way
to find out the 'state of the art' wrt to make test.
That is, my patch + request of a few days ago:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-February/062303.html
resulted in a very nice, easy to digest report
On 08/02/2008, Jeremy White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That data has five test runs and shows clear across
the board failures in msi:install, shell32:shellink,
user32:listbox, and user32:msg.
The user32:listbox tests fail everywhere when not run from the
dlls/user32/tests directory! I have a
I believe that we have an easy way
to find out the 'state of the art' wrt to make test.
That is, my patch + request of a few days ago:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-February/062303.html
resulted in a very nice, easy to digest report
http://test.winehq.org/data/20080205/
