On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Francois Gouget wrote:
> My understanding is that Posix threads have never been and will never be
> sufficient for Wine. The only reason we have a pthreads version of Wine
> is that on recent Linux distributions the way they are implemented makes
> it possible for Wine to achie
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would you mind reverting this, at least for FreeBSD? FreeBSD does have
> POSIX threads, in -STABLE and especially improved in -CURRENT (which will
> soon become the stream for regular releases.
Posix threads are not enough, we need an implementation t
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Alexandre,
>
> I noticed that you disabled using pthreads on non-Linux platforms by
> means of the following patch:
>
> revision 1.12 of loader/Makefile.in
> date: 2003/11/11 00:48:21; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +12 -11
> Only build b
Alexandre,
I noticed that you disabled using pthreads on non-Linux platforms by
means of the following patch:
revision 1.12 of loader/Makefile.in
date: 2003/11/11 00:48:21; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +12 -11
Only build both Wine binaries on Linux, pthread support doesn't work
After last night's changes to loader/pthread.c,v
revision 1.2
date: 2003/11/09 01:25:23; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +67 -11
Moved the remaining SYSDEPS_* functions to the wine_pthread interface.
Let the pthread library allocate the stack itself.
we have a new portability prob
