Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi all,
The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions.
Yes it did and some are still not fixed. Flash does not work anymore on all
the pages. This really needs to be fixed.
I've been looking on it for a while and I didn't find
Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions.
Yes it did and some are still not fixed. Flash does not work anymore on all
the pages. This really needs to be fixed.
The plugin came from windows Firefox 3.0.5 where it works fine (under Wine).
Vitaliy.
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:13:48PM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
>>> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
>>> Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix
>>> re
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> James Mckenzie wrote:
>>> It depends on the timeline for the 1.2 release.
>>> If this is a long way off, it may be worth the effort.
>>
>> I don't know. The 1.1 branch has are lots of im
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> James Mckenzie wrote:
>> It depends on the timeline for the 1.2 release.
>> If this is a long way off, it may be worth the effort.
>
> I don't know. The 1.1 branch has are lots of improvements
> people want; what's so special about Gecko?
> IMHO
James Mckenzie wrote:
> It depends on the timeline for the 1.2 release.
> If this is a long way off, it may be worth the effort.
I don't know. The 1.1 branch has are lots of improvements
people want; what's so special about Gecko?
IMHO we should leave the 1.0 branch alone,
and just get on with 1.
Jacek Caban wrote:
>Sent: Feb 5, 2009 12:28 PM
>To: James Mckenzie
>Cc: Scott Ritchie , wine-devel
>Subject: Re: New Wine Gecko package
>
>James Mckenzie wrote:
>> Jacek Caban wrote:
>>
>>> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>>
>>&
Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
>> Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix
>> requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:
>>
>
>
Paul TBBle Hampson schrieb:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
>> Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix
>> requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:
>>
>
>
James Mckenzie wrote:
> Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>
>>> Is this version compatible with Wine 1.0.1 by chance?
>>>
>>>
>> No, it's technically impossible.
>>
>>
> Is it possible to build a patch upgrade to 1.0.1 to incorporate the new Gecko
> or will we h
Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> Jacek Caban wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
>>> Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires
>>> a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:
>>>
>>> http://ge
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
>> Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires
>> a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:
>>
>> http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/w
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
> Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix
> requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:
> http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/wine_ge
Hi Jacek,
"Jacek Caban" wrote in message
news:498a2a37.6070...@codeweavers.com...
> Hi all,
>
> Also the last debug version was accidentally stripped. It will be fixed
> in this release. I'm planning to do the release tomorrow, so it will be
> in Git on Friday.
I've test a few apps (TopStyle, We
Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
> Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires
> a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:
>
> http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/wine_gecko-0.9.1.cab
>
> I'd appr
Hi all,
The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to
Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires
a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:
http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/wine_gecko-0.9.1.cab
I'd appreciate if people that observe the
Hi Lei,
Lei Zhang wrote:
>
> (Let me know if you'd prefer to discuss this in the bug report instead)
>
It doesn't matter for me.
> The patch didn't apply cleanly against today's wine-git. Can you
> regenerate the patch?
That was because it contained a few patches that were committed today.
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've released first (and hopefully last) RC build of new Gecko package
> and attached a patch against current Wine Git to bug 16198
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16198
> It's critical to make
Hi,
I've released first (and hopefully last) RC build of new Gecko package
and attached a patch against current Wine Git to bug 16198
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16198
It's critical to make sure, that there will be no regressions due to the
new Gecko, it'd much more w
Ok than I will start using the new version when it's ready.
It' s a good thing that someone is working on a update.
thank you
Marco
Jacek Caban schreef:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>> marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> And what do we do for now ?
>>> Is it still wise to distribute a old version, w
Dan Kegel wrote:
> marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And what do we do for now ?
>> Is it still wise to distribute a old version, what are the risk that someone
>> can use a gecko bug and do some harm in linux or is that not very likely
>> with wine ?
>>
>
> Either
> a) wait for Jacek's
marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And what do we do for now ?
> Is it still wise to distribute a old version, what are the risk that someone
> can use a gecko bug and do some harm in linux or is that not very likely
> with wine ?
Either
a) wait for Jacek's updated gecko + build procedure
or
b) co
Ok thank you,
And what do we do for now ?
Is it still wise to distribute a old version, what are the risk that
someone can use a gecko bug and do some harm in linux or is that not
very likely with wine ?
marco
Dan Kegel schreef:
> marco meijer wrote:
>
>> I have a question about wine_geck
marco meijer wrote:
> I have a question about wine_gecko-0.1.0.cab
>This package is from 2007-05-30 11:42 and in the mean time firefox
> had a lot of security updates.
> Is it still save to distribute wine_gecko-0.1.0.cab ?
We'd like to move to a newer one.
See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.c
Hi All,
I'm the packager of the Mandriva package.
And I have a question about wine_gecko-0.1.0.cab
This package is from 2007-05-30 11:42 and in the mean time firefox
had a lot of security updates.
Is it still save to distribute wine_gecko-0.1.0.cab ?
Kind regards,
Marco
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> One problem with your version scheme is that there's no obvious way of
> determining which version is newer, or compatible. A simple string
> comparison won't work for that purpose.
>
>> By coexisting different versions you mean in one Wine prefix? Yes, it
>> would be
Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The plan is to pass the version in URL query. Then the redirecting
> script will take care on choosing the correct file from SourceForge.
> It's backward compatible as older Wine won't pass the version so script
> will assume that an old Gecko is requested
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Yes, that's my plan, but I'm not sure why it's important for this patch.
>> Currently Wine downloads always the same Gecko version that was never
>> updated, so this check should work with current Wine. It will change
>>
Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, that's my plan, but I'm not sure why it's important for this patch.
> Currently Wine downloads always the same Gecko version that was never
> updated, so this check should work with current Wine. It will change
> once we will switch to the new version
N(mshtml))
>> -check_version(gre_path);
>> +/* We may consider message box here */
>> +if(ERR_ON(mshtml) && !check_version(gre_path))
>> +MESSAGE("Found a version of Wine Gecko package that is not
>> dedicated "
>> +
y consider message box here */
> +if(ERR_ON(mshtml) && !check_version(gre_path))
> + MESSAGE("Found a version of Wine Gecko package that is not dedicated
> "
> +"to your Wine version. Reinstalation is recommended.\n");
If you wa
Luke Bratch wrote:
>
> Perfect, that fixes all regressions that I can find -
> and the scroll bars still work in Steam!
>
Great, thanks. I will wait until tomorrow and then upload it to
SourceForge. Some changes in Gecko installer will be needed to support
different package versions.
Thanks,
--- Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for testing! You've found a serious
> problem with handling
> https protocol (shame on Mozilla build system). I've
> fixed it and did
> serious changes in the package. I hope it's a final
> version of the package:
>
>
http://gerwazy.lo3.wr
Jacek Caban wrote:
> I've attached a hack from Picasa tree that
> causes links opening in new window to be opened in winebrowser.
I forgot to attach the patch. Here it is.
Jacek
diff --git a/dlls/shdocvw/navigate.c b/dlls/shdocvw/navigate.c
index 161c138..bdd0fdb 100644
--- a/dlls/shdocvw/naviga
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>>
> BTW why JavaScript doesn't work or any pop-up windows don't open? I know
> this works fine with Firefox.
>
>
>
It needs some support from Gecko embedder (MSHTML in ou
Luke Bratch wrote:
> Yup this fixes that problem for me, however I've found
> another regression.
>
> If you view for instance this page in most browsers
> including the old wine Gecko, you will see "Buy Now"
> buttons:
>
> http://www.tghost.co.uk/sale.html
>
> But with the new one, they are render
Indeed they would. Only I would say picasa to steam ratio would be
1-to-100. And btw only most rudimentary things work in both! Steam
worked _perfectly_ before. And I'm sure would still worked. But now, you
can't buy stuff, you can't open screen-shots (because they are popups)
you don't see MOTO w
Jacek Caban wrote:
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
BTW why JavaScript doesn't work or any pop-up windows don't open? I know
this works fine with Firefox.
>>> It needs some support from Gecko embedder (MSHTML in our case) and I
>>> haven't worked on it yet (with exception of
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>>> BTW why JavaScript doesn't work or any pop-up windows don't open? I know
>>> this works fine with Firefox.
>>>
>>>
>> It needs some support from Gecko embedder (MSHTML in our case) and I
>> haven't worked on it yet (with exception of built in alert pop-up).
>>
Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> Jacek Caban wrote:
>>
>> wine iexplore http://winehq.org/ crashes for me.
>>
> Could you please send me seh,tid,mshtml,shdocvw logs?
Never mind. It was some testing patch in my tree that broke things.
>> BTW why JavaScript doe
--- Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I think I found the fix. I've uploaded a new
> package. It's the
> same URL as before:
>
http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/wine_gecko.tar.bz2
> It fixes the crash for me.
Yup this fixes that problem for me, however I've found
another regress
Hi Vitaliy,
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's time to update our Gecko package. I've prepared a new one. I'd like
>> to avoid any regression, esp. ones that would require changing the
>> package again. That&
Jacek Caban wrote:
>> - Extracting it to install it manually works, as do
>> the scroll bars (which work fine)
>> - It crashes after submitting more than one form on
>> websites. For instance searching for something on
>> Google, then searching again will cause a crash.
>>
>>
>
> Thanks fo
Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's time to update our Gecko package. I've prepared a new one. I'd like
> to avoid any regression, esp. ones that would require changing the
> package again. That's why I'd like to do a good test. I'm interested in
>
Luke Bratch wrote:
>> I'm interested in
>> regressions, so just a simple test if app that
>>
> worked before still works
>
>> will be fine.
>>
>
> I've given it a test, and found the following:
>
> - When setting that URL in HKCU\Software\Wine\MSHTML,
> it will download but fail to ins
Hi all,
It's time to update our Gecko package. I've prepared a new one. I'd like
to avoid any regression, esp. ones that would require changing the
package again. That's why I'd like to do a good test. I'm interested in
regressions, so just a simple test if app that
> I'm interested in
> regressions, so just a simple test if app that
worked before still works
> will be fine.
I've given it a test, and found the following:
- When setting that URL in HKCU\Software\Wine\MSHTML,
it will download but fail to install.
- Extracting it to install it manually works, a
Hi all,
It's time to update our Gecko package. I've prepared a new one. I'd like
to avoid any regression, esp. ones that would require changing the
package again. That's why I'd like to do a good test. I'm interested in
regressions, so just a simple test if app that
48 matches
Mail list logo
