Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-05 Thread André Hentschel
Joel Holdsworth schrieb: >>> It works for precreated manifest as a separate file (not compiled in), >>> isn't it? If so you could do a trick that >>> I spotted here >>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078869.html >>> for a first time - >>> here another process is created

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-04 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Joel Holdsworth wrote: It works for precreated manifest as a separate file (not compiled in), isn't it? If so you could do a trick that I spotted here http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078869.html for a first time - here another process is created after main test binary

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-04 Thread André Hentschel
Joel Holdsworth schrieb: >>> It works for precreated manifest as a separate file (not compiled in), >>> isn't it? If so you could do a trick that >>> I spotted here >>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078869.html >>> for a first time - >>> here another process is created

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-03 Thread Joel Holdsworth
> > It works for precreated manifest as a separate file (not compiled in), > > isn't it? If so you could do a trick that > > I spotted here > > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078869.html > > for a first time - > > here another process is created after main test binary l

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-02 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Frank Richter wrote: >> >> On 02.10.2009 00:27, Joel Holdsworth wrote: >> >>> >>> Does anyone have any thoughts about what might be going on here, and >>> what I should do with my tests? >>> >> >> If the manifest is set up dynamically I would

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-02 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Frank Richter wrote: On 02.10.2009 00:27, Joel Holdsworth wrote: Does anyone have any thoughts about what might be going on here, and what I should do with my tests? If the manifest is set up dynamically I would expect that all symbols imported from comctl32.dll are done so _before_ th

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-02 Thread Frank Richter
On 02.10.2009 00:27, Joel Holdsworth wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts about what might be going on here, and > what I should do with my tests? If the manifest is set up dynamically I would expect that all symbols imported from comctl32.dll are done so _before_ the manifest takes effect, ie a

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-02 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Joel Holdsworth wrote: On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 02:40 +0400, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Hi, Joel. It works for precreated manifest as a separate file (not compiled in), isn't it? If so you could do a trick that I spotted here http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078869.html f

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-02 Thread Joel Holdsworth
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 02:40 +0400, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Joel Holdsworth wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm working on some tests to demonstrate some alpha-channel behaviour in > > comctl32 ImageLists. The problem is that this behaviour is only present > > in comctl32 v6, which of course you usually a

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-02 Thread André Hentschel
Nikolay Sivov schrieb: > Joel Holdsworth wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm working on some tests to demonstrate some alpha-channel behaviour in >> comctl32 ImageLists. The problem is that this behaviour is only present >> in comctl32 v6, which of course you usually activate with an xml >> manifest. For t

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-01 Thread Owen Rudge
It sounds like I need to investigate further, but no - I'm only talking about Windows. With crosstest, load_v6_module seems not to switch to v6 with regard to image lists. That's curious. What version of Windows are you using? Could you try applying my imagelist patches I linked to earlier and

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-01 Thread Joel Holdsworth
> Do you mean that the tests pass on Windows but not Wine when using > load_v6_module, or that they don't pass on either platform? I used > load_v6_module for some v6 imagelist tests (which may not yet be merged > into Wine actually; I should probably check that and resubmit) and they > worked

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-01 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Joel Holdsworth wrote: Hi All, I'm working on some tests to demonstrate some alpha-channel behaviour in comctl32 ImageLists. The problem is that this behaviour is only present in comctl32 v6, which of course you usually activate with an xml manifest. For the wine test suite we have a helper func

Re: Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-01 Thread Owen Rudge
Hi Joel, I'm working on some tests to demonstrate some alpha-channel behaviour in comctl32 ImageLists. The problem is that this behaviour is only present in comctl32 v6, which of course you usually activate with an xml manifest. For the wine test suite we have a helper function, load_v6_module,

Image List tests for comctl32 v6

2009-10-01 Thread Joel Holdsworth
Hi All, I'm working on some tests to demonstrate some alpha-channel behaviour in comctl32 ImageLists. The problem is that this behaviour is only present in comctl32 v6, which of course you usually activate with an xml manifest. For the wine test suite we have a helper function, load_v6_module, tha