Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alright. It'd be nice if somebody who knew all the rules of DLL separation
> would write them up somewhere. At the moment I basically have to guess.
> Apologies if it's already written up or the rules are obvious to all
> except me :)
Basically you can onl
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:39:48 -0800, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Extending the WND structure is OK (though it doesn't seem necessary in
> that case), but accessing it from x11drv is a violation of dll
> separation. We still do that in a number of places but they will have
> to be fixed, so we probab
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The other reason it might have bounced is if we're not allowed to extend
> WND, though as it's purely internal and not accessible from the APIs that
> should be OK? I'm not sure how to do this otherwise without exporting the
> currently locked window variab
