Hi,
Do the patches take into account that a header might only be
included to
check that an exported function matches the declaration in the
header file?
I've extended my script to handle this case.
Cheers,
Jon
=
Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to come;
Don't you sit
Jon Griffiths wrote:
Hi,
--- Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that some removed include files might be needed for different
systems,
so some breakage might/may/will follow this patch.
I deliberately made my script remove only Wines own headers for this
reason. It will not remove
Jon Griffiths wrote:
[Snip]
Yes, its a little crufty as-is. My reasoning is that anything that
reduces my compile times after updates is good, and my laptop takes
quite a while to rebuild Wine, Minimising dependencies helps that.
On a related note, would anyone object to a patch that auto-split
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:20:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering that it takes 6-8 hours to compile on my poor old machine
Wow! I thought 1h on my old box was excessive. What kind of machine is that?
--
Dimi.
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:20:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering that it takes 6-8 hours to compile on my poor old machine
I would appreciate anything that would speed up the process. I dread
having to do a ./configure. I know you guy's with your multi GHz
machines might say
