Steven Edwards skrev:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
>> Sure it might be confusing, because that's not how the logic goes in the
>> Microsoft world. Over there, the big machine acting as Terminal Server
>> thing is the server, and the Remote Desktop client, which provides the
On 18 February 2010 22:08, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
>> Sure it might be confusing, because that's not how the logic goes in the
>> Microsoft world. Over there, the big machine acting as Terminal Server
>> thing is the server, and the Remote Deskt
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Sure it might be confusing, because that's not how the logic goes in the
> Microsoft world. Over there, the big machine acting as Terminal Server
> thing is the server, and the Remote Desktop client, which provides the
> actual display, is the c
Steve Brown skrev:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Ove Kaaven wrote:
>
>> James McKenzie skrev:
>>> I'll agree that this is duplication of the existing X11 code, but the
>>> effect is more pleasant to the eye and leads to less user confusion, not
>>> to speak of a less expensive solution (I have yet to fin
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Ove Kaaven wrote:
James McKenzie skrev:
I'll agree that this is duplication of the existing X11 code, but the
effect is more pleasant to the eye and leads to less user confusion, not
to speak of a less expensive solution (I have yet to find a 'free' X11
client that is worth
James McKenzie skrev:
> I'll agree that this is duplication of the existing X11 code, but the
> effect is more pleasant to the eye and leads to less user confusion, not
> to speak of a less expensive solution (I have yet to find a 'free' X11
> client that is worth anything on Windows.)
You mean X
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:31 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 12 February 2010 06:11, Jui-Hao Chiang wrote:
>
>> I am currently starting a project which tries to run a window
>> application on one (source) machine, and display on another
>> (destination) machine. Of course, the VNC or X11 forwarding
On 12 February 2010 06:11, Jui-Hao Chiang wrote:
> I am currently starting a project which tries to run a window
> application on one (source) machine, and display on another
> (destination) machine. Of course, the VNC or X11 forwarding technique
> can achieve the same goal, but I am trying to re
Charles Davis wrote:
> Jui-Hao Chiang wrote:
>
>> Hi, all:
>>
>> I am currently starting a project which tries to run a window
>> application on one (source) machine, and display on another
>> (destination) machine. Of course, the VNC or X11 forwarding technique
>> can achieve the same goal, but
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Charles Davis wrote:
> Jui-Hao Chiang wrote:
>> Hi, all:
>>
>> I am currently starting a project which tries to run a window
>> application on one (source) machine, and display on another
>> (destination) machine. Of course, the VNC or X11 forwarding technique
>> c
Jui-Hao Chiang wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I am currently starting a project which tries to run a window
> application on one (source) machine, and display on another
> (destination) machine. Of course, the VNC or X11 forwarding technique
> can achieve the same goal, but I am trying to reduce the bandwi
Hi, all:
I am currently starting a project which tries to run a window
application on one (source) machine, and display on another
(destination) machine. Of course, the VNC or X11 forwarding technique
can achieve the same goal, but I am trying to reduce the bandwidth by
"not" transferring the vide
12 matches
Mail list logo
