On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> Maybe it's just time to remove the "replace malloc with HeapAlloc"
> task from the wiki? Or, at least, add a note to explain that we expect
> the current Wine code to be "compliant".
Done.
2010/12/30 Dan Kegel :
> Yegor wrote:
>> it's my first contribution to wine...
>
> Welcome!
>
>> so I wanted to start with some simple task.
>
> Changing memory allocation might not be simple.
>
> Your patch touches two different DLLs.
> You should probably split this patch up, one patch per dll.
>
Yegor wrote:
> it's my first contribution to wine...
Welcome!
> so I wanted to start with some simple task.
Changing memory allocation might not be simple.
Your patch touches two different DLLs.
You should probably split this patch up, one patch per dll.
Also, the fact that your change to d3dc
On 12/30/10 5:02 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
Hello,
it's my first contribution to wine, so I wanted to start with some
simple task. After fixing the files mentioned in the attached patch,
following files in dlls folder still contain malloc/free calls:
dlls/ntdll/server.c:if (!(tmp_dir
Hello,
it's my first contribution to wine, so I wanted to start with some
simple task. After fixing the files mentioned in the attached patch,
following files in dlls folder still contain malloc/free calls:
dlls/ntdll/server.c:if (!(tmp_dir = malloc( p + 1 -
config_dir ))) fatal_error