Re: KERNEL32: add a test case for CompareStringW undocumented flag 0x10000000

2004-11-22 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Shachar Shemesh wrote: Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: "Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The flag (0x1000) passed to CompareString reverse the sort order of a number of unicode characters. I've got no idea why it would want to do that... maybe somebody can shed some light on what the reas

Re: KERNEL32: add a test case for CompareStringW undocumented flag 0x10000000

2004-11-22 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: "Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The flag (0x1000) passed to CompareString reverse the sort order of a number of unicode characters. I've got no idea why it would want to do that... maybe somebody can shed some light on what the reason behind this would

Re: KERNEL32: add a test case for CompareStringW undocumented flag 0x10000000

2004-11-21 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The flag (0x1000) passed to CompareString reverse the sort order of > a number of unicode characters. I've got no idea why it would want to > do that... maybe somebody can shed some light on what the reason behind > this would be? Just a shot

KERNEL32: add a test case for CompareStringW undocumented flag 0x10000000

2004-11-21 Thread Mike McCormack
Hi All, I've written a regression test that shows what the undocumented flag 0x1000 passed by shlwapi.StrIsIntlEqualW/A to CompareStringW/A does. I discovered the different by writing a short program that compared the output of CompareString with and without the flag for all unicode charac