Re: Less than 300 Coverity errors !!

2010-01-08 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:17:59AM -0600, Austin English wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Paul Vriens > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just wanted to mention the fact that Marcus (almost single-handedly for the > > last months) got the number of issues below 300. > > Thanks Marcus! No worries.

Re: Less than 300 Coverity errors !!

2010-01-08 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Paul Vriens wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted to mention the fact that Marcus (almost single-handedly for the > last months) got the number of issues below 300. Thanks Marcus! > Only 11 of those are marked as either a bug or are pending. The rest is > either false (Cov

Less than 300 Coverity errors !!

2010-01-08 Thread Paul Vriens
Hi, Just wanted to mention the fact that Marcus (almost single-handedly for the last months) got the number of issues below 300. Only 11 of those are marked as either a bug or are pending. The rest is either false (Coverity thinks there is an error, but we don't) or to be ignored (for exampl