Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Austin English"
> Date: December 22, 2008 6:12:13 PM EST
> To: "Zach Drayer"
> Subject: Re: Linking to a Mac OS X build of Wine from winehq.org/
> download ?
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Zach Drayer wrote:
&
>>>
>>> Yes, I would like to keep Darwine as the name of the old powerpc
>>> project
>>> that combined an x86 emulator and wine.
>>>
>>> Can we convince Mike and Zach to switch names to just plain Wine?
>>>
I'd have no problems switching over to just using Wine instead of
Darwine. Also, maybe J
-Original Message-
>From: Dmitry Timoshkov
>Sent: Dec 21, 2008 10:45 PM
>To: Dan Kegel , Roderick Colenbrander
>Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org, z...@drayer.name, ies4...@kronenberg.org
>Subject: Re: Linking to a Mac OS X build of Wine from winehq.org/download ?
>
>"
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
> of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it
> from http://winehq.org/download/ ?
>
> Furthermore, are his packages good enough to support?
> If so,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Zach Drayer wrote:
Can we convince Mike and Zach to switch names to just plain Wine?
>
> I'd have no problems switching over to just using Wine instead of Darwine.
> Also, maybe Jim White or someone else that actually developed Darwine could
> comment? All I d
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
wrote:
http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
>> Can we convince Mike and Zach to switch names to just plain Wine?
>
> And change the licencing conditions to LGPL, currently that page states
> "Darwine and wine are released under the gpl".
Mike,
"Dan Kegel" wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Roderick Colenbrander
> wrote:
>>> Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
>>> of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it
>>> from http://winehq.org/download/ ?
>>>
>>> Furthermore, are
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:21 PM, James McKenzie
wrote:
> I would like to see something like the following (and it follows the
> OpenOffice.org strategy for releases):
>
> Wine.
>
> So Wine for the Mac Intel would appear like this:
>
> Wine-1.1.9-MacOSX-Intel-DragnDrop.dmg
>
> Where Wine for a
Nathaniel Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Roderick Colenbrander
>> wrote:
>>
Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we lin
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Roderick Colenbrander
> wrote:
>>> Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
>>> of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it
>>> from http://winehq.org/downlo
On 21 Dec 2008, at 16:50, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
> of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it
> from http://winehq.org/download/ ?
>
> Furthermore, are his packages good enough to support?
> If so, how 'b
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Roderick Colenbrander
wrote:
>> Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
>> of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it
>> from http://winehq.org/download/ ?
>>
>> Furthermore, are his packages good enough to s
> Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
> of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it
> from http://winehq.org/download/ ?
>
> Furthermore, are his packages good enough to support?
> If so, how 'bout we ask him to add links to bugzilla and
Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source
of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it
from http://winehq.org/download/ ?
Furthermore, are his packages good enough to support?
If so, how 'bout we ask him to add links to bugzilla and
the appdb f
14 matches
Mail list logo
