On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 17:16, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > http://test.winehq.org/data/200503181000/nt4/shlwapi:shreg.txt > > What's going on? > > > regards, > Jakob > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Index: dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c,v > retrieving revision 1.25 > diff -u -r1.25 shreg.c > --- dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c 3 Feb 2005 19:38:58 -0000 1.25 > +++ dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c 22 Mar 2005 16:15:56 -0000 > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ > todo_wine > { > ok( (0 == strcmp("", buf)) | (0 == strcmp(sEnvvar2, buf)), > - "Expected empty or first part of the string (win98), got > (%s)\n", buf); > + "Expected empty or first part of the string \"%s\", got > \"%s\"\n", sEnvvar2, buf); > } > > ok( dwSize >= nUsedBuffer2, "Buffer size (%lu) should be >= (%lu)\n", > dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); Hi,
one of the things that's strange about this system was reported by me on wine-devel a few days ago: http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2005/03/0889.html any idea? Paul.
