Re: New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-26 Thread Dan Kegel
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Dan Kegel wrote: >> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/diff-comctl32_tab.txt >> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/vg-comctl32_tab.txt >> show a more inscrutable error: >>  Invalid write of size 4 >>    at

Re: New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Dan Kegel wrote: http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/diff-comctl32_tab.txt http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/vg-comctl32_tab.txt show a more inscrutable error: Invalid write of size 4 at TAB_SetCurSel (tab.c:255) by TAB_WindowProc (tab.c:3367) by

Re: New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-19 Thread Austin English
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >>> I'm not sure about the user (i.e. developer) interface for turning the >>> heap >>> check on.  Should it be automatic when one does warn+heap? >> >> If I got it right it makes sense to e

Re: New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-19 Thread Dan Kegel
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >> I'm not sure about the user (i.e. developer) interface for turning the >> heap >> check on.  Should it be automatic when one does warn+heap? > > If I got it right it makes sense to enable this only running under valgrind > control? Nope. I

Re: New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-19 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Dan Kegel wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/ is the first full run with the heap tail check enabled. So you use some private patches for that, why aren't they merged? 'Cause I just wrote it an hour

Re: New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-19 Thread Dan Kegel
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/ >> is the first full run with the heap tail check enabled. > > So you use some private patches for that, why aren't they merged? 'Cause I just wrote it an hour before that message? I alr

Re: New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-19 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Dan Kegel wrote: http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/ is the first full run with the heap tail check enabled. So you use some private patches for that, why aren't they merged? Here are the first few new problems it found. Somehow, it found a bunch of invalid reads in http:/

New valgrind results, this time with overrun checks and lots of new errors.

2009-11-19 Thread Dan Kegel
http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/ is the first full run with the heap tail check enabled. Here are the first few new problems it found. Somehow, it found a bunch of invalid reads in http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/vg-advapi32_crypt.txt all in a function ca