"Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, line 183 in dlls/gdi/tests/metafile.c detects rather nicely whether
> we are running in an interactive desktop or not.
>
> I could copy that logic to winetest.exe
>
> metafile.c : 183
> ok(emr_processed, "EnumEnhMetaFile couldn't find EMR_EXTTE
If the implementation of automated testing is broken why not fix it or work
around the issues rather than abandon the whole idea? Isn't it useful to
have all non-interactive tests run automatically on dozens of machines? If
it isn't useful then I agree, we should stop the automated testing.
C
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If it really breaks the tests then definitely yes.
I think it does provide much useful information which would
be largely lost if we resorted to manual testing. What's
Good, I kind of hoped you thought so too.
more, winet
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you agree, should we stop using winrash?
>
> "Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I tried now marking the service as interactive,
>>> but that didn't make any difference.
>>>
>>>
