Re: Packagers: consider not packaging wine-1.1.12, or cherrypicking fixes

2009-01-06 Thread Scott Ritchie
Dan Kegel wrote: wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708 Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes, or skipping wine-1.1.12. 1.1.11 had a

Packagers: consider not packaging wine-1.1.12, or cherrypicking fixes

2009-01-03 Thread Dan Kegel
wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708 Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes, or skipping wine-1.1.12.

Re: Packagers: consider not packaging wine-1.1.12, or cherrypicking fixes

2009-01-03 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:11:23AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708 Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes, or